One
year after Typhoon Haiyan, much rebuilding still ahead
(Vatican Radio) One year after Typhoon Haiyan struck the
Philippines—and despite major reconstruction efforts—thousands of people in the
most-affected regions continue to live in temporary shelters.
The typhoon hit the island nation on 8 November 2013, killing more
than 8,000 people. More than 500,000 homes were destroyed, along with major
infrastructure. An estimated 11 million people were affected.
“The destruction was absolutely enormous,” said Michael Casey,
executive director of Development &Peace, the Canadian member of Caritas
Internationalis. Casey was in the Philippines recently with a delegation that
included Archbishop Michael Miller of Vancouver and Bishop Jean-Louis Plouffe
of Sault Ste. Marie.
“The community is starting to be rebuild,” reported Casey.
“There’s still a lot of people in temporary shelters, like in the tent camps
that were set up.”
The delegation visited the nine Filipino dioceses most affected by
the typhoon and those to which D&P has committed its support through a three-to-five-year
program, focused on the “permanent rebuilding of communities”, namely housing
and providing livelihood support.
“Many of the communities were coastal communities, fishing (was)
their livelihood,” explained Casey. “Their fishing facilities were destroyed
and so we’ve been assisting and replacing some of those.”
While D&P has built 1,600 homes to date, Casey signaled that
one challenge in the reconstruction is ironically a security measure that has
been put in place to avoid such large-scale disasters in the future.
'NO-BUILD ZONE'
“The government of the Philippines had put in what they call a
‘no-build zone’ along the coastal areas. This is as a disaster-mitigation
strategy, which means that you can’t rebuild where houses were formerly built
on … the coastline,” he said.
So, people continue to live in temporary camps “while there’s
discussion going on about finding land for them to be able to re-locate,” he
said.
In some cases, the local or provincial governments had provided
land for rebuilding that was too distant from the shoreline.
“You’re looking at a community of fishermen that have to…commute
10km just to get to their boats, to go out to fish. It was really problematic,”
Casey said. “So there is a lot of questioning by the communities about this …
no-build zone because it has effectively deprived them of the areas where they
used to live.”
The problem of providing land for reconstruction is exacerbated by
the fact that “land is a very scarce and precious commodity in the Philippines—
it being an island nation—with a very large and growing population,” Casey
underlined.
Another D&P priority is the re-establishment of community
life. Casey said in the communities he visited, the local church, “in various
degrees of repair or disrepair…was always a gathering point for the people and
a central point for community life.”
D&P’s programming also includes psycho-social support and
post-traumatic counselling, aimed at helping people through their grief. He
said his delegation observed how one community organized a healing ceremony to
help people cope with having lost family members in the disaster.
RESILIENCE AND RECOVERY
Despite the major loss and destruction, Casey said he was struck
by how “relatively quickly people resumed normal life” and by “the resilience
and the recovery of the Filipino people”. Nearly one year later, children are
back in school and people are working, he said.
However, Casey has also observed happen in the Philippines what
happens in most major disasters: the urgent needs of victims are well met
immediately following a disaster, but the world’s attention then quickly shifts
elsewhere.
With all the significant reconstruction ahead, he lamented,
“there’s no longer the major media looking at what is going to be a much longer
process.”
Report and interview by Laura Ieraci
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét