Fr Cantalamessa gives first
Advent reflection to Pope and Roman Curia
![]() |
| Advent sermon (ANSA) |
The Preacher of the Papal Household, Fr Raniero
Cantalamessa, gives his first Advent reflection at the Redemptoris Mater Chapel
in the Apostolic Palace. Below is the full text of his sermon.
P. Raniero Cantalamessa ofmcap
BLESSED IS SHE WHO BELIEVED!”
Mary in the Annunciation
First Advent Sermon 2019
BLESSED IS SHE WHO BELIEVED!”
Mary in the Annunciation
First Advent Sermon 2019
Every year the liturgy leads us to Christmas with
three guides: Isaiah, John the Baptist and Mary, the prophet, the precursor,
the mother. The first announced the Messiah from afar, the second showed him
present in the world, the third bore him in her womb. This Advent I have
thought to entrust ourselves entirely to the Mother of Jesus. No one, better
than she can prepare us to celebrate the birth of our Redeemer.
She didn’t celebrate Advent, she lived it
in her flesh. Like every mother bearing a child she knows what it means be
waiting for somebody and can help us in approaching Christmas with an expectant
faith. We shall contemplate the Mother of God in the three moments in which
Scripture presents her at the center of the events: the Annunciation, the Visitation
and Christmas.
1. “Behold, / am the handmaid of
the Lord”
We start with the Annunciation. When Mary went to visit
Elizabeth she welcomed Mary with great joy and praised her for her faith
saying, “Blessed is she who believed there would be a fulfillment of what was
spoken her from the Lord” (Lk 1:45). The wonderful thing that took place in
Nazareth after the angel’s greeting was that Mary “believed,” and thus she
became the “mother of the Lord.” There is no doubt that the word “believed”
refers to Mary’s answer to the angel: “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord;
let it be to me according to your word (Lk 1:38).
In these few simple words, the greatest and most decisive
act of faith in history took place. Mary’s answer represents the “summit of all
religious behavior before God, because it expresses, to the highest degree,
both a passive willingness and active readiness, the deepest void that
accompanies the greatest fullness.”[1] Origen said that it’s as if Mary were
saying to God, “Behold, I am a tablet to be written on: let the Writer write
whatever he wills, let the Lord of all things do with me as he wishes”[2]. He
compared Mary to the wax writing tablet used in his day. Nowadays, we might say
that Mary offered herself to God as a clean page on which he could write
whatever he wanted.
In an instant that will exist for all time and remain for
all eternity, Mary’s word was the word of humankind and her ‘yes’ was the Amen
of all creation to God’s ‘yes’ ” (K. Rahner). It’s as if God were once again
challenging created freedom through her, offering it a chance of redemption.
This is the deep meaning of the Eve-Mary parallelism, so meaningful to the
Fathers of the Church and all tradition. “That which Eve had bound through her
unbelief, Mary loosened through her faith.”[3]
From Elizabeth’s words “Blessed is she who believed” we note
that early in the Gospel Mary’s divine maternity is not just considered in the
physical sense but, much more so, in a spiritual sense, based on faith. This is
what St. Augustine based himself on when he said: “The Virgin Mary gave birth
believing what she had conceived believing. . . . When the angel had spoken,
she, full of faith (fide plena), conceiving Christ in her
heart before she did so in her womb, answered: ‘Behold, I am the handmaid of
the Lord, let it be to me according to your word.’ ”6 The fullness
of faith on Mary’s part corresponds to the fullness of grace on God’s part,
the fide plena to the gratia plena.
Alone with God
At a first glance, Mary’s act of faith was easy and could
even be taken for granted. She was to become the mother of a king who
would reign forever in the house of Jacob, mother of the Messiah! Wasn’t this
the dream of every Hebrew girl? But this is a rather human and worldly way of
reasoning. True faith is never a privilege or an honor; it means dying a
little, and this was especially true of Mary’s faith at that moment.
First of all, God never deceives and never surreptitiously
extorts consent from his children by concealing the consequences from them of
what they are taking on. We can see this in every great calling on God’s part.
He forewarned Jeremiah: “They will fight against you” (Jer 1:19), and to
Ananias he said of Saul: “I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake
of my name” (Acts 9:16). Would he have acted differently only with Mary for a
mission such as hers? In the light of the Holy Spirit that accompanied God’s
call, she certainly sensed that her path would be no different from that of
all other “chosen ones.” In fact, Simeon soon put this foreboding into words
when he told her that a spear would pierce her soul.
But even on a simply human level Mary found herself in complete
solitude. To whom could she explain what had taken place in her? Who would
believe her when she said that the child she was carrying in her womb was the
work of the Holy Spirit? This was something that had never taken place before
and would never take place again. Undoubtedly Mary was well aware of what the
law exacted if the signs of virginity were not found in a young woman at
marriage: she would be brought to the door of her father’s house and be stoned
to death by the men of her city (see Deut 22:20 f.).
Nowadays we are quick to talk about the risk of faith, and
we generally mean the intellectual risk, but Mary faced a real risk! In his
book on the Madonna, Carlo Carretto told us how he came to understand Mary’s
faith[4]. When he was living in the desert, he had heard from some Tuareg
friends of his that a young girl in the encampment had been betrothed to a
young man but she had not gone to live with him as she was too young. Carretto
had associated this fact with what Luke said of Mary. So, two years later,
finding himself in the same encampment, he asked about the girl. He noticed a
certain embarrassment among his interlocutors, and later one of them, secretly
approaching him, made a sign to him: he held his hand to his throat in the
characteristic gesture of the Arabs when they want to say, “Her throat has
been slit.” It had been discovered that she was with child before the
marriage, and her death was necessary for the honor of the family. Then he
thought of Mary again, of the pitiless glances of the people of Nazareth, of
the knowing winks, and he understood Mary’s solitude, and that same night he
chose her as his traveling companion and the mistress of his faith.
Mary is the only one to have believed in a “situation of
contemporaneity,” that is to say, she believed while the event was taking place
and prior to any confirmation by the event or by history.8 She
believed in total solitude. Jesus said to Thomas: “Have you believed because
you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe! ” (John
20:29). Mary was the first to have believed without having seen.
In a similar situation, almost in triumph and amazement,
Scripture tells us that Abraham, who was promised a son even though he was
advanced in years, “believed the Lord; and he reckoned it to him as
righteousness” (Gen 15:6). And with what greater triumph can we now say that of
Mary! Mary had faith in God, and it was reckoned to her as righteousness—the
greatest act of righteousness ever fulfilled on earth by a human being, after
that of Jesus, who is, however, also God.
St. Paul said that “God loves a cheerful giver” (2 Cor 9:7),
and Mary uttered her yes cheerfully. The verb Mary used to express her consent
and which is translated by fiat or by “let it be done” is in
the optative mood (genoito) in the original text. It doesn’t
just express a simple resigned acceptance but a living desire. It’s as if she
were saying, I, too, desire with all my being what God desires; let his wish be
fulfilled quickly. Indeed, as St. Augustine said, before conceiving Christ in
her body she conceived him in her heart.
Mary didn’t use the Latin word fiat; neither did
she use the Greek genoito. What did she use then? Which word
or expression? What did a Jew say for “so be it”? He said “Amen!” If we
reverently try to go back to the ipsissima vox, that is, to
the exact word Mary used—or at least to the word that existed on this point in
the Hebrew source used by Luke—it must really have been the word “amen.”
“Amen”—a Hebrew word whose root means solidity, soundness—was used in the
liturgy as an answer in faith to God’s word. Each time in the Vulgate
where fiat, fiat appears at the end of certain psalms (in the
Septuagint version, genoito, genoito) the original Hebrew,
which Mary knew, is amen, amen!
The use of “amen” acknowledges what has been said as being
firm, stable, valid, and binding. Its exact translation when it is in answer to
God’s word is, “It is so, may it be so.” It indicates both faith and obedience;
it acknowledges that what God says is true and submits to it. It is saying yes
to God. This is how Jesus himself used it: “Yea, Amen, Father, for such was thy
gracious will” (Matt 11:26). Rather, he is the Amen personified (see Rev 3:14),
and that is why we utter the amen through him, to the glory of God (see 2 Cor
1:20). Just as Mary’s fiat precedes that of Jesus in
Gethsemane, so her amen precedes that of the Son. Mary, too, is a personified
amen to God.
In Mary’s Wake
The wake left on the surface of the water by a lovely ship
gradually spreads until it disappears altogether and merges with the horizon,
but it started with the point of the ship itself. The same is true of the wake
of believers who make up the Church. It begins at a certain point, and this
point is Mary’s faith, her fiat. Faith, together with its
sister, hope, is the only thing that does not begin with Christ but with the
Church, and therefore with Mary, who was its first member in the order of time
and importance. Jesus cannot be the subject of the Christian faith because he
is its object. The Letter to the Hebrews gives us a list of those who had
faith: “By faith Abel. ... By faith Abraham. . . . By faith Moses” (Heb 11:4
ff.). Jesus is not included! Jesus is called the “founder and perfecter of
faith” (Heb 12:2), the one on whom our faith depends from beginning to end, but
not one of the believers, even the first.
By the mere fact of believing we therefore find ourselves in
Mary’s wake, and we now want to look more deeply at what following in her wake
really means. From reading what concerns Mary in the Bible, we can see that the
Church, right from the Fathers, has followed a criterion that can be expressed
thus: Maria, vel Ecclesia, vel anima: “Mary, or rather the
Church, or rather the soul.” The meaning is that what is said especially of Mary
in Scripture is universally meant for the Church, and what is universally said
of the Church is meant personally for each believer.
Keeping to this principle, let us now see what Mary’s faith
has to say first of all to the Church as a whole and then to each one of us.
Just as we did with grace, let us first stress the ecclesial or theological
implications of Mary’s faith and then the personal or ascetical implications.
In this way, the Madonna’s life will not just be useful in developing our
private devotion but will also give us a deeper understanding of God’s Word and
of the Church’s problems.
First of all, Mary talks to us of the importance of faith.
There can be no sound or music if there is no ear to hear it, no matter how
many melodies or sublime chords fill the air. There is no grace, or at least
grace cannot work, if there is no faith to accept it. Just as the rain cannot
germinate anything unless it falls on soil that absorbs it, so it is with grace
if it doesn’t fall upon faith. It is through faith that we are sensitive to
grace. Faith is the basis for everything; it is the first and the best among
the good works. This is the work of God, that you believe, Jesus said (see John
6:29). Faith is so important because it alone maintains the gratuity of grace.
It doesn’t try to invert the order, making God a debtor and man a creditor.
That’s why it is so dear to God, who makes almost everything depend on faith in
his relations with man.
Grace and faith: this is how the two pillars of salvation
are placed. Man is given two feet to walk on or two wings to fly with. It is
not, however, a question of two parallel things, almost as if grace came from
God and faith from us and that salvation thereby depends equally on God and us,
on grace and freedom. Heaven help the person who thinks that grace depends on
God but faith depends on me; together God and I bring about salvation! We
would once again have made God a debtor, somehow depending on us and who must
share the merit and glory with us. St. Paul banished all doubt when he said,
“By grace you have been saved through faith, and this [that is, faith, or more
generally, being saved by grace through faith, which is the same thing] is not
your own doing, it is the gift of God, lest any man should boast” (Eph 2:8
ff.). Also Mary’s act of faith was prompted by the grace of the Holy Spirit.
What interests us now is to throw light on some aspects of
Mary s faith that could lead today’s Church to greater belief. Mary’s act of
faith was very personal, unique, and can never be repeated. It was trust in God
and the total entrusting of herself to God. It was a person-to-person relation.
This is called subjective faith. The emphasis is on believing
rather than on what is believed. But Mary’s faith was also very objective. She
didn’t believe in a subjective, personal God, detached from everything, who
revealed himself only to her in secret. She believed, instead, in the God of
the Fathers, the God of her people. She saw in the God who revealed himself to
her the God of the promises, the God of Abraham and his descendants. She humbly
felt part of the host of believers and became the first believer of the new
covenant, just as Abraham was the first believer of the old covenant.
The Magnificat is full of this faith based on Scripture and of
references to the history of her people. Mary’s God was a God of exquisitely
biblical characteristics: Lord, Almighty, Holy, Savior. Mary would not have
believed the angel if he had revealed a different God to her, one whom she
could not have recognized as the God of her people Israel. Also in her external
life Mary conformed to this faith. She subjected herself to all that the Law
prescribed: she had the child circumcised, she presented him in the Temple, she
underwent the rite of purification, and she went up to Jerusalem for Passover.
There is a great lesson in all of this for us. Faith, like
grace, has throughout the centuries undergone the phenomenon of analysis and
division, so that we have innumerable forms and sub forms of faith. Our
Protestant brethren, for example, give more value to the first
aspect—subjective and personal—of faith. Luther wrote, “Faith is a living and
bold trust in God’s grace”; it is a “firm trust.”13 In some
trends of Protestantism, as in Pietism, where this tendency is carried to the
extreme, dogmas and the so- called truths of faith are of very little
importance. An interior personal attitude toward God almost exclusively
prevails.
Instead, in the Catholic and Orthodox tradition, the problem
of right faith and orthodoxy has always been of great importance right from
ancient times. The problem of what was to be believed very quickly prevailed
over the subjective and personal aspect of believing, that is to say, over the
act of faith. The treatises of the Fathers called “On Faith” (De fide) do
not even mention faith as a subjective act or as trust and abandonment, but
they are concerned with defining the truths to be believed in communion with
the whole Church in opposition to the heretics.
After the Reformation and as a reaction to the unilateral
emphasis on faith-trust, this tendency became more emphasized in the Catholic
Church. “Believing” principally meant adhering to the belief of the Church. St.
Paul said that man believes with the heart and he confesses with his lips (see
Rom 10:10), but the confession of the right faith has often prevailed over
believing with the heart.
In this case, too, Mary urges us to find again the “whole,”
which is much richer and much more beautiful than each single part. A simple
subjective faith, a faith that is abandonment to God in one’s inner conscience,
is not sufficient. It is easy to reduce God to one’s own measure this way. This
happens when we form our own idea of God, based on our own personal interpretation
of the Bible or on the interpretation of our own narrow circle, and then adhere
to this with all our strength, even fanatically, without realizing that we
believe more in ourselves than in God and that our unshakable trust in God is
nothing other than an unshakable trust in ourselves.
However, a simply objective and dogmatic faith is not enough
either, if it fails to lead to an intimate I-you personal contact with God. It
can easily become a dead faith, belief through a third person or institution,
which fails as soon as there is a crisis, no matter what the reason, between
one’s faith and one’s personal relation with the institution of the Church. In
this way, a Christian can easily reach the end of his life without ever having
made a free and personal act of faith, which alone justifies the name “believer.”
It is necessary, therefore, to believe personally, but in
communion with the Church; we must believe in communion with the Church, but
personally. The dogmatic faith of the Church doesn’t take from personal faith
or from the spontaneity in believing, rather, it preserves it and allows us to
know and embrace an immensely greater God than the God of our own limited
experience. There is no one, in fact, who is able to embrace through his own
act of faith all that can be known about God. The faith of the Church is like a
great wide-angle lens, which, in a particular panorama, makes it possible to
see and photograph a much wider view than that of the simple lens. In uniting
myself to the faith of the Church, I make the faith of all those who have gone
before me mine: that of the apostles, the martyrs, and the Doctors of the
Church. The saints, as they could not take their faith to heaven with them,
where they no longer need it, left it in heredity to the Church.
The words “I believe in God the Father Almighty” contain incredible
power. My small “I” united and joined to the great “I” of the whole mystical
body of Christ, and present, makes a sound more powerful than the roaring of
the sea and makes the very foundations of the reign of darkness tremble.
Let Us Too Believe!
Let us now go on to consider the personal and ascetic
implications that spring from Mary’s faith. After affirming in the above-
mentioned text that Mary, “full of grace, gave birth believing what she had
conceived believing,” St. Augustine explained what he meant: “Mary believed and
what she believed was fulfilled in her. Let us, too, believe so that what was
fulfilled in her may also be to our advantage.”
Let us, too, believe! The contemplation of Mary’s faith
urges us to renew, above all, our personal act of faith and abandonment to
God. That is why it is so vitally important to say to God, once in life, let it
be done, fiat, as Mary did. This is an act enveloped in
mystery because it involves grace and freedom at the same time; it is a form of
conception. The soul cannot do it alone; God helps, therefore, without taking
away freedom.
What should we do then? The answer is simple: after praying,
so that our prayer does not remain superficial, say to God, using the very
words Mary used: Here I am, I am the servant of the Lord: let it be done to me
according to your word! I am saying amen, yes, my God, to your whole plan. I
give you myself!
We must, however, remember that Mary pronounced her fiat willingly
and joyfully. How often do we repeat the word with poorly hidden resignation
and, tight lipped, murmur, “If it cannot be avoided, well then, let your will
be done!” Mary teaches us to say it in a different way. Knowing that God’s will
is infinitely more beautiful and richer in promises than any of our own plans,
and knowing that God is infinite love and nourishes “plans for welfare and not
for evil for us” (see Jer 29:11), let us say, full of desire and almost
impatiently, as Mary did: Let your will of love and peace be fulfilled in me, O
God!
In this way the meaning of human life and its greatest
dignity is fulfilled. To say yes, amen, to God does not decrease man’s dignity,
as modern man often thinks; instead, it exalts it. And what is the alternative
to this amen said to God? Modern philosophy itself, especially the existential
stream, has clearly demonstrated man’s need to say amen, and if it is not said
to God, who is love, it must be said to something else that is simply a cold
and paralyzing necessity: to destiny or fate.
“The righteous shall live by his faith”
We are all called to imitate Mary’s faith, but especially
pastors and those in any way called to transmit the faith and the Word to
others. The righteous, God says, shall live by his faith (see Heb 2:4; Rom
1:17), and this is true in a special way of pastors. My priest, God says, shall
live by his faith. He is the man of faith. A priest’s “specific weight” depends
on his faith. His influence on others will be determined by his faith. A
priest’s, or pastor’s, task among his people is not simply that of distributing
the sacraments and of service, but it is also that of enkindling faith and
being a witness to it. He will really be one who guides and leads souls to God
to the extent to which he believes and has given his freedom to God, as Mary
did.
The essential thing that the faithful sense immediately in a
priest or in a pastor is whether he believes or not, whether he believes in
what he is saying and in what he is celebrating. Whoever is seeking God through
a priest will realize this immediately. Whoever is not seeking God through him
may easily be deceived and, in turn, deceive the priest himself, making him
feel important, clever, and with-the-times, whereas in fact he, too, may
be empty, like the man without grace we mentioned in the last chapter. Even a
nonbeliever who approaches a priest with a searching spirit immediately
understands the difference. What can provoke him and cause him to positively
query his way of life are not, generally speaking, the most gifted discussions
on faith but simple faith itself. Faith is contagious. Just as contagion does
not take place by simply talking about or studying a virus but by coming into
contact with it, so it is with faith.
The power of God’s servant is in proportion to the strength
of his faith. We sometimes suffer or maybe complain to God in prayer because
people abandon the Church, they go on sinning, and because we talk and talk
without results. One day the apostles tried unsuccessfully to cast out a demon
from a young boy. After Jesus had cast it out the disciples came to Jesus in
private and said: “ ‘Why could we not cast it out?’ And Jesus said to them,
‘Because of your little faith’ ” (Matt 17:19-10).
As we have said, the world, like the sea, is furrowed by the
wake of a beautiful ship, which is the wake of faith, started by Mary. Let us
be part of this wake. Let us, too, believe, so that what was fulfilled in her
will be fulfilled in us. Let us invoke the Madonna with the sweet title
of Virgo fidelis: Virgin most faithful, pray for us!
[1] H. Schurmann, Das Lukasevangelium, Freiburg
in Br., 1982, ad loc.
[2] Origen, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, Fragment
18 (GCS 49, p. 227).
[3] St. Irenaeus, Against the Heresies, III,
22, 4 (SCh 211, p. 442).
[4] See C. Carretto, Blessed Are You Who Believed, London,
Burns & Oates, 1982, p. 3 f.

Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét