South Africa Corruption Inquiry signal to Africa and beyond
![]() |
| South Africa Former President Zuma gives testimony at the State Capture Inquiry (ANSA) |
Former South African President, Jacob Zuma, continues to lay
the blame on others and to paint himself as the victim of a conspiracy, as a
State Corruption Inquiry goes ahead in Johannesburg. The Director of the Jesuit
Institute of South Africa explains why the Inquiry is so important.
By Linda Bordoni
The State Capture Inquiry is spotlighting the allegations of
graft that clouded Jacob Zuma's nine-year presidency and provides a strong
signal to the nation that the current President, Cyril Ramaphosa, is delivering
on his promise to fight corruption.
But, as Russell Pollitt SJ points out, the
crunch is still to come.
The Director of the Jesuit Institute in South Africa told
Linda Bordoni that at the heart of the matter are allegations that Zuma allowed
his business friends, the Guptas, to plunder state resources and influence
senior government appointments.
This happened to such an extent during Zuma’s years in
power, the term “State Capture” is being used to describe how much businesses
and politicians conspired to influence the country's decision-making process to
advance their own interests.
The State Capture Inquiry, which began hearing the
testimonies of various people last August, Father Russell Pollitt explained,
was set up to investigate allegations that the State had been “captured” by a
powerful Indian family, the Guptas, and this all took place under the reign of
President Jacob Zuma (2009-2018).
The Inquiry, also known as the “Zondo Commission”, is led by
the Deputy Chief Justice, Ray Zondo, is currently hearing the testimony of the
former president himself.
Pollitt said that beginning on Monday, Zuma “started
off giving this long, rambling political speech in which he said a whole lot of
things that didn’t make sense”, and has since been ducking questions.
“What he did was namedrop a whole lot of people who
were Ministers in his own Cabinet, whom he claims are spies” involved in a
conspiracy plot against him, Pollitt said, noting that Zuma comes across as a
man “who is very afraid, and trying to not come clean on what he knows”.
The Inquiry has no legal standing but it is important
Pollitt explained that although the Inquiry has no legal
standing it will give Cyril Ramaphosa, a series of recommendations upon which
he will have to take action deciding whether or not they will lead to
prosecutions.
He explained that the Inquiry is important “because the
Deputy Chief Justice was appointed to lead this and he is a man of high
standing, and ultimately, when the report is handed over, the president will
have to decide what to do with it”.
National interest
Pollitt said the proceedings are garnering a lot of interest
across the board: “There are a lot of journalists present, ongoing reports,
it’s screened all day on a TV channel.”
He said it is also generating a lot of frustration as
citizens continue to express their view that Zuma is a liar and will say
anything to cover up.
“There is a feeling of hopelessness that anything
substantial will come out of it and that Zuma will take responsibility for the
mess that he left the South African State in,” he said.
On a personal note, Pollitt expressed his hope that the
Inquiry will lead to prosecutions.
“I hope that not just Zuma, but a whole lot of people who
surrounded him will be called to account,” he said.
He said it is also very relevant that right from the
beginning of the Inquiry it has become public knowledge that a number of people
involved in big businesses and in state-owned enterprises are implicated: “This
web went very deep. The tentacles and the grip of the Gupta family that had the
President in their pocket went very deep, and it’s quite clear that the country
lost millions”.
“I hope that this Commission will be able to come up with
concrete evidence and that the president has the courage to act on that
evidence and that, eventually we will see people who are called to account by
going to prison or however the Lord decides they need to be dealt with,” he
said.
A signal for governments in Africa and beyond
Pollitt notes that the Commission sends an important signal
beyond the nation, “especially to the African Continent, where African leaders
who have done terrible things and brought nations to their knees have never
been held to account”.
There is always this idea, he explained, that the older
statesman, who has been there for a long time, cannot be called to account.
I hope, he said, South Africa is setting a trend by
showing-up a president, who has brought such difficulty and allowed corruption
to flourish under his tenure, and that he will be brought to justice.
“The real crunch,” Pollitt noted, “is going to come when
this Commission wraps up and has to decide what to choose to do with the
evidence”.

Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét