Card.
Ravasi on “Light” and its symbol as the Revelation
(Vatican Radio) Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, President of the
Pontifical Council for Culture, has marked the opening of the
International Year of Light with a speech that focuses on light as a
theological symbol.
The International Year of Light is a global
initiative which aims to highlight the importance of light and optical
technologies in the lives of all citizens and in the development of society.
This International Year, proclaimed by a large
consortium of scientific bodies together with UNESCO, brings together
many different stakeholders including scientific societies and unions,
educational institutions, technology platforms, non-profit organizations and
private sector partners.
In proclaiming an International Year focusing on
the topic of light science and its applications, the United Nations says it
recognizes the importance of raising global awareness about how light-based
technologies promote sustainable development and provide solutions to global
challenges in energy, education, agriculture and health. Light plays a vital
role in our daily lives and is an imperative cross-cutting discipline of
science in the 21st century. It has revolutionized medicine, opened up
international communication via the Internet, and continues to be central to
linking cultural, economic and political aspects of the global society.
Please find below Cardinal Ravasi’s speech for
the Opening of the International Year of Light:
LIGHT, UNIVERSAL SYMBOLIC AND ARCHETYPE
In all
civilisations light passes from being a physical phenomenon to being a symbolic
archetype, with an endless spectrum of metaphoric iridescence, especially of a
religious kind. The primary connection is cosmological by nature: the entrance
of light marks the absolute incipit of creation in its being and existence.
Emblematic is the very opening of the Bible, which remains the “great code” of
Western culture: Wayy’omer ʼelohȋm: Yehȋ ʼôr. Wayyehȋ ʼôr, “God said, ‘Let
there be light!’ And there was light!” (Genesis 1:3). A sonorous divine event, a
sort of transcendent Big bang, generates a luminous epiphany: silence and
darkness is broken open to unleash creation.
In ancient
Egyptian culture, too, the irradiance of light accompanies the first cosmic
dawn, marked by a great waterlily which comes out of the primordial waters
generating the sun. This will be above all the star that becomes the very heart
of the theology of Pharaonic Egypt, in particular the solar divinities Amon and
Aton. This last god, with Amenophis IV-Akhenaton (XIV cent. BC), will become
the centre of a sort of monotheistic reform, sung by the Pharaoh himself in a
splendid Hymn to Aton, the solar disk: this reform, though, will pass as a
short meteor in the sky of traditional Egyptian solar polytheism.
Similarly the
archaic Indian theology of the Rigveda considered the creative divinity
Prajāpati as a primordial sound that exploded in a myriad of lights, creatures
and harmonies. Not for no reason, in another religious movement that originated
in that same land, its great founder took up the sacral title of Buddha, which
means theIllumined one. And coming into more recent historical periods, Islam
too chose light as a theological symbol, indeed one entire “surah” of the
Qu’rān, n. XXIV, is called An-nûr, “the Light”. One of its verses would become
an enormous success with an intense allegorical exegesis in the “Sūfī”
tradition (particularly with the mystical thinker al-Ghazali in the XI-XII
cent.).
It is the
verse 35 which sounds as follows: “God is light in the heavens and on the
earth. The light is as a lamp placed in a niche. The lamp is enclosed in a
crystal, it is as a star with blinding light lit up with oil from a blessed
olive tree … Light on light is God. He guides those he loves towards his light.”
This series of examples could be continued at length passing through the many
cultural and religious expressions of the East and West that use, as a
theological hinge, something which is at the root of shared existential, human
experience. For life is a “coming into light” (as birth is defined in many
languages), and it is living in the light of the sun or guided in the night by
the light of the moon and the stars.
LIGHT AS A "THEO-LOGICAL" SYMBOL
Given
the limits of our analysis, we will now satisfy ourselves with two essential
observations, destined only to allow an intuition of the complexity of the
symbolic elaboration built on this cosmic reality. On one hand we shall look
more closely at the “theo-logical” quality of light, where it is an analogy to
speak of God; on the other hand, we shall examine the dialectic of
light-darkness in its moral and spiritual value. We shall take as an example
the Bible which generated for Western culture a basic iconographic and
ideological “lexicon”. It offers us an excellent general systematic paradigm,
with significant internal coherence. The Hebrew-Christian Scriptures have been,
among other things, a central cultural reference point for entire centuries, as
one independent and alternative witness, the philosopher Friederich Nietzsche
put it: “Between what we feel in reading Pindar or Petrarch and reading the
Biblical Psalms, there is the same difference as between the foreign land and
the homeland” (“preparatory materials” for Aurora).
Unlike other
civilisations where, simplifying things, light (especially solar) is identified
with divinity itself, the Bible introduces a significant distinction: light is
not God, but God is light. This excludes, then, a pantheistic realistic aspect,
and introduces a symbolic perspective that conserves the transcendent, while
affirming a presence of the divine in the light that remains, but as, “work of
his hands.” This is how we should interpret the affirmations scattered
throughout the new testament writings attributed to John the evangelist. In
them we find that: ho Theòs phôs estín, “God is light” (1 John 1:8). Christ
himself presents himself thus: egô eímì to phôs tou kósmou, “I am the light of
the world” (John 8:12). Along this line stands that literary and theological
masterpiece, the hymn which opens the Gospel of John where the Lógos, the
Word-Christ, is presented as the “light that enlightens all men” (1:9).
This last
expression is significant. Light is assumed as a symbol of the revelation of
God and his presence in history. On one hand, God is transcendent and this is
expressed by the fact that light is external to us, it precedes, exceeds, and
is above us. God, however, is also present and active in creation and in human
history, showing himself immanent, and this is illustrated by the fact that
light encompasses, specifies, warms and pervades us. Thus the believer also
becomes luminous: think of the face of Moses irradiating light, after having
been in dialogue with God on the peak of Sinai (Exodus 34:33-35). The faithful
person too becomes a source of light, once he has let himself be enfolded by
divine light as Jesus affirmed in his famous “sermon on the Mount”: “You are
the light of the world … Your light must shine in the sight of men” (Matthew
5:14.16).
In this
trajectory, if the Pythagorical tradition imagined the souls of the righteous
departed were transformed into the stars of the milky way, the biblical book of
Daniel takes on this intuition but liberates it from its immanentist realism
transforming it into an ethical-eschatological metaphor: “The learned will
shine as brightly as the vault of heaven, and those who have instructed many in
virtue, as bright as stars for all eternity” (12:3). And in the Roman
Christianity of the first centuries – once the date of 25 December for the
Birth of Christ had been chosen (this was the pagan feast of the god Sun, in
the winter solstice which marked the beginning of the ascent of light,
previously humiliated by winter darkness) – they would begin to define a
Christian in the burial inscriptions aseliópais, “son of the Sun”. The light
which radiated Christ-Sun was also destined, then, to encompass the Christian.
Indeed, in
later Christian tradition, a sort of theological solar system would be
established: Christ is the sun; the Church is the moon, which shines reflected
light; Christians are the stars, not having their own light but being
illuminated by the supreme celestial light. That this exquisitely symbolic
vision was destined to exalt the revelation and communion between divine
transcendence and human historical reality seems clear from a surprising but
coherent passage from the last biblical book, Revelation, where in the
description of the ideal city of the perfect eschatological future, the new and
celestial Jerusalem, proclaims “It will never be night again and they will not
need lamplight or sunlight, because the Lord God will be shining on them”
(22:5). The communion of humanity with God will then be full and every symbol will
fall away to leave space for the truth of the direct encounter.
THE DIALECTIC OF LIGHT-DARKNESS
It is
interesting to note that in the text cited mention is made of the night and,
hence, of the circadian rhythm. This is a characteristic tópos of eschatology
(that is of the end times), as we read in the book of the prophet Zechariah
who, when describing the end of history, paints it as a “single day with no
alternation of day and night, and in the evening it will be light” (14:7). Now,
in history that daily rhythm between light and darkness remains and becomes
itself an ethical-metaphysical sign. We intend to speak of the dialectic
light-darkness that appears in the above mentioned book of Genesis. The
creative divine act, expressed through the image of the “separation” puts order
into the “disorder” of nothing: “God saw that the light was good/beautiful and
God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light day and the
darkness he called night” (Genesis 1:4-5).
Significant also
is the definition of light as tôb, a Hebrew adjective that is at the same time
ethical, practical and aesthetic and so, designates something that is good,
beautiful and useful. In contrast, then, the darkness is the negation of being,
of life, of good of truth. This is why, while the paradisiacal zenith is
immersed in the splendour of light, the infernal nadir is clothed in obscurity,
as we read in the biblical book of Job where hell is described as “the land of
darkness and mortal shadows, the land of dimness and murk, of night and chaos,
in which light itself is deep darkness” (10:21-22).
For the same
reason the antithesis light-darkness is transformed into a moral and spiritual
paradigm. And this is what appears in many cultures and has its apex in the
above cited hymn-prologue of the Gospel of John where the light of the divine
Word “shines in the darkness and the darkness did not overpower the light”
(1:5). And again in the same fourth Gospel we read: “The light has come into
the world, but men have preferred the darkness to the light … those who do
wrong hate the light and avoid it … those who live by the truth come out into
the light” (John 3:19-21). In the Judaic community active from the first
century BC onwards, discovered at Qumran along the western banks of the Dead
Sea, a text describes the “war of the sons of the light against the sons of
darkness” following a constant symbolic module to define the contrast between
good and evil, between the elect and the reprobates.
This dualism
is reflected also in the opposition angels-demons or in the antithetic
principles yang-yin, in the divinity in combat between them such as the creator
Marduk and the destructive Tiamat, the divinities of the Babylonian cosmogony,
or as Ormuzd (or Ahura-Mazda) and Ahriman of the Mazdean Persian religion, or
as Devas and Asuras in the Indian world. The same dialectic acquires a new form
in the mystical horizon, when it introduces the theme of the “obscure night”,
as seen by the great sixteenth century Spanish mystical author and poet, St
John of the Cross. In this case the torment, the trial and the spirit’s waiting
in the night is as a rich womb that preludes the generation of the light of
revelation and encounter with God.
In synthesis
we could share the affirmation of Ariel in Goethe’s Faust: Welch Getöse bringt
das Licht!, “What noise light brings!” (II, act I, v. 4671). It is in fact a
glorious and vital sign, a sacred and transcendent metaphor, but it is not
inoffensive for it generates tension with its opposite, darkness, transforming
itself into a symbol of the moral and existential fight. Its irradiation, then,
from the cosmos passes into history, from the infinite it descends into the
finite and it is for this that humanity seeks the light, as a final cry that is
attributed to the same Goethe, Mehr Licht!, “more light!”: in the physical
sense due to the closing of the eyes in agony, but also in the existential and
spiritual sense of desire for a supreme epiphany of light. This is what the
ancient Hebrew poet of the Psalms invoked: “In you, God, the spring of life, in
your light we shall see light!” (Psalm 36:10).
Card. GIANFRANCO RAVASI
19 January 2015
19 January 2015
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét