Full Transcript of Pope's Press Conference
on Flight from Manila
In a
wide-ranging press conference, on the flight from Manila to Rome, Pope Francis
spoke about corruption in Governments and the Church, the need for prudence
with freedom of expression, why he didn’t meet the Dalai Lama recently,
and the Church’s position on birth control.
He talked too about the trips he intends to make to three cities
in the USA, and – though plans are not yet finalized - to three Latin
American countries (Ecuador, Bolivia and Paraguay) and two African countries
(Uganda and the Central African Republic) this year, and his hope to visit
Argentina, Chile and Uruguay in 2016.
He discussed the canonization of Junipero Serra and the
beatification of Archbishop Romero. He reflected on his appeal to the
moderate Muslim leaders to condemn terrorist violence done in the name of
Islam, and shared his feelings about his visit to the Philippines.
Francis came to the back of the plane to speak with journalists
approximately one hour after takeoff from Manila and in a free flowing 56
minute press conference, speaking in Italian, he answered 11 questions from
journalists who put questions from their respective language groups.
THE FOLLOWING IS A FULL TRANSCRIPT IN ENGLISH OF THE POPE’S PRESS
CONFERENCE (The translation is unofficial, and was done by the author and other
colleagues aboard the papal flight)
Father Lombardi
Holy Father, thank you for being with us, we see you are in
splendid form after these days of travel, and we thank you for giving us more
work to do today as well, as your conversation will give us work for the
duration of the trip. Before we put the question perhaps you would like to say
something to us.
POPE: First of all
I greet you. Good day, thank you for your work. It was challenging, and
as we say in Spanish, “pasada per agua” (it rained on the parade). It is
beautiful, and I thank you very much for what you have done.
WHAT DID YOU LEARN FROM THE FILIPINOS?
Lombardi: The first
question will be from Kara David, who is part of the Filipino group.
Kara David (GMA Network): Good day Holy Father. Sorry, I
will speak in English. Thank you very much for visiting our country and for
giving so much hope to the Filipinos. We would like you to come back to our
country. My question is: the Filipinos have learned a lot from listening to your
messages. Is there something the Holy Father has learned from the
Filipinos, from your encounter with us?
Pope: The gestures! The gestures moved me. They are not
protocol gestures, they are good gestures, felt gestures, gestures of the
heart. Some almost make one weep. There’s everything there: faith,
love, the family, delusion, the future. That gesture of the fathers who think
of their children so that the Pope will bless them. Not one gestures, there
were fathers, there were many who thought of their children when we passed by
on the road, a gesture which in other places one does not see, as if they say
this is my treasure, this is my future, this is my love, for this one it’s
worth working, for this one it’s worth suffering. A gesture that is original
but born from the heart.
A second gesture that struck me very much is an enthusiasm that is
not feigned, a joy, a happiness (allegria), a capacity to celebrate. Even
under the rain, one of the masters of ceremonies told me that he was edified
because who were serving never lost the smile (on their face. It’s the
joy, not feigned joy. It wasn’t a painted (false) smile. No,
no! It was a smile that just came, and behind that smile there is a
normal life, there are pains, problems.
Then there were the gestures of the mothers who brought their sick
children. Indeed mothers in general bring them there, but usually mothers
do not lift the children up so much, only up to here. The dads do, one sees
them. Here dad! Then many disabled children, with disabilities that make some
impression; they did not hide the children, they brought them to the Pope so
that he would bless them. This is my child, s/he is mine. All
mothers know this, they do this. But it’s the way they did this that
struck me. The gesture of motherhood, of fatherhood, of enthusiasm, of
joy.
There’s a word that’s difficult for us to understand because it
has been vulgarized too much, used too badly, too badly understood, but it’s a
word that has substance: resignation. A people who knows how to suffer, and is
capable of rising up.
Yesterday, I was edified at the talk I had with the father of
Kristel, the young woman volunteer who died in Tacloban. He said she died
in service, he was seeking words to confirm himself to this situation, to accept
it. A people that knows how to suffer, that’s what I saw and how I interpreted
the gestures.
2. VISITS TO AFRICA
Jean Louis De La Vaissiere (AFP): Holy Father, you have now
gone twice to Asia. The Catholics of Africa have yet to receive a visit from you.
You know that from South Africa to Nigeria to Uganda many faithful who suffer
from poverty, war, Islamic fundamentalism hope you will visit this year.
So I would like to ask you, when and where are you thinking of going?
POPE: I will respond hypothetically. The plan is to go to
the Central African Republic and Uganda, these two, this year. I think
that this will be towards the end of the year, because of the weather,
no? They have to calculate when there won’t be rains, when there won’t be
bad weather. This trip is a bit overdue, because there was the Ebola
problem. It is a big responsibility to hold big gatherings, contagion,
no? But in these countries there is no problem. These two are
hypothetical, but it will be this year.
3. STATE TERRORISM AND THE THROWAY CULTURE
Lombardi: Now we give the floor to our friend Izzo
Salvatore, from the Italian information agency AGI.
Salvatore Izzo (AGI) :Holy Father, in Manila we were in a very
beautiful hotel. Everyone was very nice and we ate very well, but as soon as
you left this hotel you were, let's call it morally accosted, at least, by the
poverty. We saw children among the trash, treated possibly I would say as
refuse (themselves). Now, I have a son who is six years old and I was ashamed
because they were in such poor conditions. I have a son Rocco who has
understood very well what you are saying when you say to share with the poor.
So on the way to school, he tries to distribute snacks to the beggars in the
area. And, for me it's much more difficult. Also for others it's very
difficult. Just one cardinal 40 years ago left everything to go among the
lepers so, I’d like to know why it is so difficult to follow that example also
for the cardinals? I also wanted to ask you something else. It's about Sri Lanka.
There we saw all of the "favelas" on the way to the airport, they are
shack supported against the tree. They practically live under the trees. Most
are Tamils and they are persecuted. After the massacre of Paris, right after
possibly A CALDO, you said there is an isolated terrorism and a state-sponsored
terrorism. What did you mean by "state-sponsored terrorism"? For me
that meant the discrimination and suffering of these people.
POPE: Thank you.
IZZO: One more thing Holy Father, I wanted to tell you that my
agency, AGI Italia is turning 65 years old. So, without taking anything
away from ANSA, but I wanted to let you know that we are working very hard in
Asia, because with the tracks that Enrico Mattei left, AGI, makes collaborative
agreements with modest agencies in Palestine, in Pakistan, in Algeria, in a lot
of countries. We would also like your encouragement. There are around 20
agencies that are associated with us in developing countries.
POPE: When one of you asked me what message I was bringing to the
Philippines, I said the poor. Yes, it's a message that Church today gives, also
the message that you say of Sri Lanka, of the Tamil and discrimination, no? The
poor, the victims of this throwaway culture. This is true. Today, they don’t
just discard the paper and what's left over. We throw away people. And
discrimination is a way of throwing away, these people are discarded. And it
comes to mind a bit the image of the castes, no? This can't go on. But today,
throwing away seems normal. And you spoke of the luxurious hotel and then the
shacks . In my diocese of Buenos Aires, there was all of the new area which is
called Puerta Madero up to the train station and then the start of the
"Villas Miserias," the poor. One after another. And in this part
there are 36 luxurious restaurants. If you eat there, they take off your head.
And here there is hunger. One next to the other. And we have the tendency to
get used to this, no? To this that… yes, yes, we're here and there are those
thrown away. This is poverty, I think the Church must give an example, a much
greater example here, refusing every worldliness. Do we consecrated, bishops,
priests, sisters, laity truly believe that the gravest sin and the gravest
threat is worldliness. It's really ugly when you see a consecrated man, a man
of the Church, a sister who is worldly. It's ugly. This is not the way of
Jesus. It's the path of an ONG that is called "church" but this isn't
the Church of Jesus, that "ONG."
Because the Church is not an ONG but another thing, but when a
part of the Church becomes worldly, it becomes an ONG and ceases to be the
Church. The Church is Jesus who died and is risen for our salvation and the
witness – one is Christian if one follows Christ.
That scandal that you've said is true, yes. Scandal, but we
Christians often cause scandal. We Christians scandalize. Whether we be priests
or laity because the way of Jesus is difficult. It's true that the Church needs
to strip itself. But you've made me think about this state terrorism . This
throwing away is exactly like terrorism. I hadn't ever thought about it
honestly but it makes me think. I don't know what to say to you but truly those
are not caresses, truly. It's like saying "No, you no. You cannot."
Or, when … it happened here in Rome that a homeless man had a stomach pain.
Poor man. When you have stomach pain you go to the hospital, into the emergency
response unit, and they give you an aspirin or something like that and then they
give you an appointment for 15 days later. The he went to a priest, and the
priest saw (his condition) and was moved and said I'll take you to the hospital
but I want you to do me a favor. When I start explaining what you have,
you pretend to faint. That's what happened. (He was) an artist. He did it well.
There was peritonitis! This man was discarded. He went out alone, he was
discarded and he was dying. That parish priest was smart, he grasped the
situation well. He was far away from worldliness, right? Can one think it was
state terrorism? Yes, one can think that.
Thanks, congratulations for the agency.
4. IDEOLOGICAL COLONIZATION, AND PAUL VI’S STANCE ON BIRTH
CONTROL
Jan Christoph Kitzler (Bayerischer Rundfunk): I would like to
return for a minute to the encounter you had with the families. You have spoken
of ideological colonization. Would you explain a bit more the concept?
Also Paul VI, speaking of the "particular causes" that are important
to in the family... Can you give an example of these particular cases and maybe
say also if there is need to open the way, to have a corridor for these
particular cases?
POPE: The ideological colonization. I'll only give you an example
of what I saw 20 years ago, in '95. A Minister of Public Education had asked
for a big loan to build schools for the poor, public schools. They gave the
loan on condition that in the schools there would be a school book for children
of a certain level, no? It was a well prepared book, where the theory of gender
was taught. This woman needed the money but that was the condition. She was
smart. She said yes, and also made them give another book, of a different
orientation. And so she succeeded. This is ideological colonization. They enter
with an idea that has nothing to do with the people; but with groups of
people yes, but not with the people. It colonizes the people with an idea that
wants to change a mentality or a structure.
During the Synod, the African bishops lamented this: certain loans
on certain conditions. I only say that which I have seen.. Why do they say
ideological colonization? Because they take a real need of the people to have
an opportunity to enter and make themselves strong with the children. But this
is not new, the dictators of the last century did the same. They came with
their own doctrine. Think of the BalilLa (The Fascist Youth under Mussolini),
think of the Hitler youth.
They colonized the people, but they wanted to do it. But how much
suffering. Peoples must not lose their freedom. A people has its culture,
its history. Every people has its own culture.
But when conditions are imposed by the colonizing empires they
seek to make peoples forget their own identity and make them (all) equal. This
is the globalization of the sphere -- all the points are equidistant from the
center. But the true globalization – and I like to say this - is not the
sphere. It is important to globalize but not like the sphere, but like the
polyhedron. Namely that every people, every part, conserves its own identity
without being ideologically colonized. These are the ideological colonizations.
There is a book, excuse me but I'll make commercial, there is a
book that maybe is a bit heavy at the beginning because it was written in 1903
in London. It is a book that at that time, the writer had seen this drama of
the ideological colonization and wrote in that book, it is called "The
Lord of the Earth" or the other title "The Lord of the World."
One of those. The author is Benson, written in 1903. But I advise you to read it,
and reading it you will understand what I mean by ‘ideological colonization’.
On Paul VI: It’s true that openness to life is a condition
for the sacrament of matrimony. A man cannot give the sacrament to the woman,
and the woman cannot give it to him, if they are not in accord on this point of
openness to life. If it can be proved that he or she married with the intention
of not being Catholic (on this point) then the matrimony is null. (It is) a
cause for the annulment of the marriage, no? Openness to life.
Paul VI had studied this with the commission for life, what to do
to help many cases, many problems, no? The important problems that make
for the love of life; the problems of every day -- but many, many.
But there was something more. The refusal of Paul VI was not only
about the personal problems, that he then tells the confessors to be
merciful, to understand if this is true, and then (he tells them) “you can be
merciful, more understanding”. He was looking at the Neo-Malthusianism
that was underway worldwide. What do you call this Neo-Malthusianism?
Less than one percent of birth rate in Italy. The same in Spain. That
Neo-Malthusianism that seeks to control humanity on behalf of the powers (that
be).
This does not mean that the Christian must make children in series.
I rebuked a woman some months ago in a parish who was pregnant eight times,
with seven C-sections (cesareans). “But do you want to leave seven
orphans? That is to tempt God! (Paul VI) speaks of responsible
parenthood. What I wanted to say was that Paul VI was not antiquated, close
minded. No,(he was) a prophet again who with this (encyclical) told us to
watch out for the Neo-Malthusianism that is coming. This is what I wanted
to say.
5 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE NEED FOR PRUDENCE
Lombardi: Thanks Holy Father. I now give the question to
Valentina, but I would like to draw your attention to the fact that we are now
over China, we seem to have now become accustomed to holding press conferences
over China, as we did returning from Korea.
Valentina ALazraki Crastich (Televisa): On the flight from
Sri Lanka you used the image of the response that this poor man (Alberto
Gasbarri, organizer of papal trips) might have merited if he insulted your
mother. Your words were not well understood by everyone in the world and seemed
to justify in some way the use of violence in the face of provocation. Could
you explain a little better what you meant to say?
Pope: In theory we can say that a violent reaction in the face of
an offense or a provocation, in theory yes, it is not a good thing, one
shouldn’t do it. In theory we can say what the Gospel says, that we
should turn the other cheek. In theory we can say that we have freedom of
expression, and that’s important. But in theory we all agree. But we are
human and there’s prudence which is a virtue of human coexistence. I
cannot constantly insult, provoke a person continuously because I risk making
him/her angry, and I risk receiving an unjust reaction, one that is not
just. But that’s human. For this reason I say that freedom of expression
must take account of the human reality and for this reason one must be prudent.
It’s a way of saying that one must be educated, prudent. Prudence
is the virtue that regulates our relations. I can go up to here, I can go
up to there, and there, beyond that no. What I wanted to say is that in
theory we all agree: there is freed of expression, a violent aggression is not
good, it’s always bad. We all agree, but in practice let us stop a little
because we are human and we risk to provoke others. For this reason freedom
must be accompanied by prudence. That’s what I wanted to say.
6. POPE IN THE USA, LATIN AMERICA, THE CANONISATION OF JUNIPERO
SERRA AND BEATIFICATION OF ARCHBISHOP ROMERO
Nicole Winfield (AP): Could you tell us about your visit to the
USA and which cities you will visit, and whether you will go to California for
the canonization of Junipero Serra, or go to the border with Mexico? Also which
Latin American countries will you visit, and do you intend to preside over the
beatification ceremony of Archbishop Romero?
POPE: I will start with the last part. There will be a
war between Cardinal Amato and Monsignor Paglia (laughs) over which of the two
will do the beatification. No, personally (speaking), the beatifications are
normally done by the Cardinal of the dicastery or someone else.
Let’s go the first (question) about (the visit to)the United
States. The three cities are Philadelphia, for the meeting of families; New
York, I have the date already but I can’t remember, for the visit the UN,
And Washington. It is these three.
I would like to go to California for the Canonization of Junipero
(fr. Junipero Serra), but I think there is the problem of time. It requires two
more days.
I think that I will do that canonization at the national Shrine
(the national Shrine of the Immaculate Conception) in Washington, It is a
national event. In Washington, (I’m not sure where) there is a statue of
Junipero at the Capitol where there is the statue of Abraham Lincoln.
Then to enter the USA from the border of Mexico would be a
beautiful thing, as a sign of brotherhood and of help to the immigrants. But
you know that go to Mexico without going to visit the Madonna (of Guadalupe)
would be a drama . A war could break out (laughing)
And then this would mean 3 more days, and this is not clear. So I
think there will only be those three cities. Later there will be time to go to
Mexico.
Did I forget something?
Latin America countries?
We have foreseen for this year – everything is still in draft
(form) -- Ecuador, Bolivia and Paraguay. These three.
Next year God willing, but everything is still in draft, I would
like to go to Chile, Argentina and Uruguay. Peru’ is missing there, but
we don’t know where to put it.
Father Lombardi: Thank you. We already have quite a precise
program of the (Pope’s) travels. Everything is provisional (this is
just a draft schedule) – nothing is decided yet.
7. CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENTS AND THE CHURCH
Jhemmyrlrut Teng ( TVS Network Inc) What can your holiness
do to fight corruption not just in governments but maybe in the Church as well?
Pope: That’s a tough one, eh? Corruption is the
order of the day in today’s world, and the corrupt attitude easily and
immediately finds a nest in the institutions, because an institution that has
many branches here and there, so many chiefs and vice-chiefs, in this way it’s
very easy for it to fall or provide a nest for corruption and every institution
can fall into this. Corruption is taking from the people. The corrupt person
who does corrupt deals or governs corruptly or associates himself with others
in order to do corrupt deals robs the people. The victims are those -- where is
he, the one with the (AGI) anniversary? -- they are those who you said were behind
the luxury hotel, no? They are the victims of corruption. Corruption is not
closed in on itself; it goes out and kills. Do you understand? Today corruption
is a worldwide problem. Once, in 2001 more or less, I asked the chief of the
cabinet of the president at that time, which was a government that we thought
to be not so corrupt - and it was true, it was not so corrupt, the government:
“Tell me, the aid that you send into the interior of the country, whether it be
in cash or food or clothes, all these things, how much gets to the place.”
Immediately this man, who is a true man, clean, (said), “35 percent.” That’s
what he told me. That was in 2001 in my homeland. And now, corruption in
ecclesial institutions. When I speak of the Church I like to speak of the
faithful, the baptized, the whole church, no? In that case, it’s better to
speak of sinners. We are all sinners, no? But when we speak of corruption, we
speak either of corrupt persons or of institutions in the church that fall into
corruption. And there are such cases, yes, there are. I remember once, in the
year 1994, when I had been scarcely named bishop of the Flores quarter of
Buenos Aires, two employees or functionaries of a ministry came to me to tell
me, “You have so much need here with so many poor in the villas miserias
(shanty towns).” “Oh yes,” I said, and they told me “We can help you. We have,
if you want, a subsidy of 400,000 pesos.” At that time, the exchange rate with
the dollar was one to one. $400,000. “You can do that?” “Yes, yes.” I listened
because, when the offer is so big, even the saint is challenged. And they went
on: “To do this, we make the deposit and then you give us half for ourselves.”
In that moment I thought about what I would do: either I insult them and give
them a kick where the sun never shines or I play the fool. I played the fool
and said, in truth, we at the vicariate don’t have an account; you have to make
the deposit at the archdiocese’s office (chancery) with the receipt. And that
was it. “Oh, we didn’t know.” And they left. But later I thought, if these two
landed without even asking for a runway -- it’s a bad thought -- it’s because
someone else said yes. But it’s a bad thought, no?
Does corruption happen easily? Let’s remember this: sinners yes,
corrupt no, never corrupt. We must ask pardon for those Catholics, those
Christians who scandalize with their corruption. It’s a wound in the church.
But there are so many saints, so many saints. And sinner saints, but not
corrupt. Let’s look at the other side, too, the church is holy. There are some
here and there. Thank you for having the courage to ask this question.
8. CHINA QUESTION
Anais Feuga (Radio France): We’ve flying over China. Coming back
from Korea, you said you’re ready to go to China tomorrow. In the light of this
declaration, can you explain why you didn’t receive the Dalai Lama when he was
at Rome a little while ago, and where do relations with China stand?
Pope: Thanks for asking me this question. It’s a habit in the
protocol of the Secretariat of State not to receive heads of state and people
at that level when they’re taking part in an international meeting here in
Rome. For example, for FAO (the Food and Agricultural Organization of the
United Nations) I didn’t receive anyone. That’s the reason he wasn’t received.
I saw that some newspapers said I didn’t receive him out of fear of China.
That’s not true. At that time, this [protocol] was the reason. He asked for an
audience, and it was said … but a date, a certain point, he had this before but
not for this moment, we are in contact. The motive was not a refusal of a
person, or fear of China. Yes, we’re open, we want peace with everyone …
How do the relations with China stand? The government of China is
respectful (educated), we’re respectful (educated), let’s take things one step
at a time. That’s how things are done in history, no? We don’t yet know, but
they know that I’m available either to receive [someone] or to go [to China].
9. RESPONSE FROM MODERATE MUSLIMS TO POPE’S APPEAL
Marco Ansaldo (La Repubblica): When you were in Turkey you
asked the leaders in the Muslim world – political, religious and accademics –
to take a stance against terrorism when acts of terrorism happen. It seems your
appeal has not been heard by the top levels of moderate Islam. .
Pope: There’s also the appeal that I repeated the very day
that I left for Sri Lanka, (the appeal) that I made in my speech to the
diplomatic corps that morning. In the speech to the diplomatic corps I
said – I don’t remember the exact words – that the religious, political,
academic and intellectual leaders express themselves. Also the people, the
moderate Islamic world, asks this from its leaders. Some of them have done
something. I believe we have to give them a little more time,because for them the
situation is not easy. And I have the hope, because there are many good
people among them,. I am sure that it will arrive. I wanted to say
the same that I repeated on the date of the departure.
10.CHURCH’S RESPONSE TO CRITICISM OF ITS STANCE ON BIRTH CONTROL
Christoph Schmidt (CIC): How does the Church respond to the
criticisms about its position on birth control given that the world population
is growing so much. And to the criticism that the poverty in the Philippines is
due to the fact that Filipino women have an average of 3 children each?
POPE: I think the number of 3 (children) per family that you
mentioned, it is the one experts say is important to keep the population
going,. three per couple. When it goes below this, the other extreme happens,
like what is happing in Italy. I have heard, I do not know if it is true, that
in 2024 there will be no money to pay pensioners (because of) the fall in
population.
Therefore, to give you an answer, they key word is the one the
Church always uses all the time and even I use it: it is responsible
parenthood. how do we do this? With dialogue. Each person with his pastor
seeks how to do that responsible parenthood .
That example i mentioned shortly before about that woman who
was expecting her eighth (child) and already had seven who were born with
caesareans. That is an irresponsibility (That woman might say) 'no but I
trust in god' But God gives you methods to be responsible. Some think
that, excuse me if i use that word, that in order to be good Catholics we have
to be like rabbits. No. Responsible parenthood! This is clear and that is why
in the church there are marriage groups, there are experts in this matter,
there are pastors, one can seek and i know so many, many ways out that are
licit and that have helped this. you did well to ask me this
Another thing in relation to this is that for the most poor
people, a child is a treasure. It is true that you have to be prudent here too
but for them a child is a treasure. (Some would say) 'God knows how to help me'
and perhaps some of them are not prudent, this is true. Responsible paternity
but let us also look at the generosity of that father and mother that see a
treasure in every child.
11. MOST MOVING MOMENTS IN THE PHILIPPINES-
Elisabetta Pique (La Nacion): Representing the Spanish language
group, I have two questions. This was a moving voyage for everyone. We
saw people crying the entire time in Tacloban, even we journalists cried.
Yesterday you said, the world needs to cry. We would like to ask you,
what was – and it was all very moving – what was for you the most moving
moment, because the mass in Tacloban was such a moment and also yesterday when
the little girl started to cry. That is the first question, what was for
you the moment. The second, yesterday you made history, you surpassed the
record set by John Paul II, in the same place, there were 6 or 7 million
people. How does it feel to have seen - Cardinal Tagle was telling us
that during the mass in front of the altar you asked him, but how many people
are here? How does it feel to have surpassed this record, to have entered
into history as the Pope with the mass with the highest attendance in
history? Thank you.
Pope: The most moving moment…For me the mass in Tacloban was very
moving. Very moving. To see all of God’s people standing still, praying,
after this catastrophe, thinking of my sins and those people, it was moving, a
very moving moment. In the moment of the mass there, I felt as though I
was annihilated (“wiped out”), I almost couldn’t speak. I felt very little
I don’t know what happened to me, maybe it was the emotion, I don’t
know. But I didn’t feel another thing, it was quite something. And then
the gestures were moving. Every gesture. When I passed and a father
would make this (gesture) and I blessed him, he would say thank you
but…for them, a blessing was enough. I thought, but I who have so many
expectations, I want this and I want that. This was good for me, no?
Moving moments. After I found out that in Tacloban we landed with winds
at 70 miles per hour, I took seriously the warning that we needed to leave no
later than one o’clock because there was a danger. But I wasn’t afraid.
As for the great turnout, I felt annihilated. These were
God’s people, and God was present, and the joy of the presence of God which
tells us - think on it well -that you are servants of these people, they are
the protagonists. Something like this.
The other thing is the weeping. One of the things that is
lost when there is too much wealth or when values are misunderstood or we have
become accustomed to injustice, to this culture of waste, is the capacity
to cry. This is a grace we must ask for. There is a beautiful
prayer in the ancient missal, for crying. It went more or less like
this: Lord, you who have made it so that Moses with his cane could make
water flow from a stone, make it so that from the rock that is my heart, the
water of tears may flow. It’s a beautiful prayer. We Christians
must ask for the grace to cry, especially well-to-do Christians. And cry
about injustice and cry about sins. Because crying opens you to
understand new realities, or new dimensions to realities. This is what
the girl said, what I said to her. She was the only one to ask that
question to which there is no answer, why do children suffer?. The great
Dostoyevsky asked himself this, and he could not answer. Why do children
suffer? She, with her weeping, a woman who was weeping. When I say
it is important that women be held in higher consideration in the church, it’s
not just to give them a function as the secretary of a disaster, though this
could be ok too. No, it’s so that they may tell us how they feel
and view reality. Because women view things from a different richness, a
larger one. Another thing I would like to underscore is what I said to
the last young man (at the meeting with young people), who truly works well, he
gives and gives and gives, he organizes to help the poor. But don’t
forget that we too need to be beggars, from them, from the poor. Because
the poor evangelize us. If we take the poor away from the Gospel, we
cannot understand Jesus’ message. The poor evangelize us. I go to
evangelize the poor, yes, but let you be evangelized by them. Because
they have values that you do not.
POPE THANKS THE MEDIA
I thank you very much for work, I have esteem for it. Thanks
very much. I know it is a sacrifice for you. Thanks very
much. I would like make these thanks concrete towards our deaconess,
whose birthday it is today. We can’t say how old you are but you’ve
worked here since you were a child, as a child, as a child. Best wishes.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét