Holy
See: Christians must be allowed to participate in public life
(Vatican
Radio) The Holy See said on Wednesday that “warning signs” are indicating
threats to religious freedom.
“The
human rights of those who wish to profess and practise their faith freely,
including Christians in particular, are often not guaranteed,” said Monsignor
Janusz Urbańczyk, the Holy See's Permanent Representative to the Organization
for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).
He
was speaking at a session discussing “fundamental freedoms,” such as freedom of
thought, conscience, religion or belief.
“We
have already heard even from some of the highest instances in society that
religious institutions, more concretely the Catholic Church, must change
teachings or positions regarding the human person,” Msgr.Urbańczyk said.
“History
already demonstrates abundantly how tragic and ultimately futile similar
attempts have proved to be,” he continued. “Christians must be enabled to
participate fully in public life on an equal footing with other human beings,
be they members of other religions or non-believers.”
The
Permanent Representative said recognizing the freedom of religion of
individuals or communities does not limit others’ freedom.
“On
the contrary, the acceptance of the religious freedom of other persons and
groups is the cornerstone of dialogue and cooperation and guarantee of all
other freedoms, including freedom of expression and peaceful assembly and
association,” Msgr. Urbańczyk said. “If freedom of religion is not respected,
inevitably many other freedoms will be eroded as well.”
The full statement of Monsignor Janusz Urbańczyk is below
STATEMENT
BY
MONSIGNOR JANUSZ URBAŃCZYK
PERMANENT
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HOLY SEE TO THE OSCE
Human
Dimension Implementation Meeting
Working
Session 15: Fundamental freedoms II:
Freedom
of thought, conscience, religion or belief
Wednesday,
September 30, 2015
Mr.
Moderator,
Respect
for religious freedom lies at the very heart of security and stability in the
OSCE area. Attempts to eclipse the role of religion in public life represent
not only a reductive notion of the nature of the human person, but also stifle
the development of authentic peace and almost certainly cause a less just
society. Defending a transcendent vision of human dignity that goes beyond the
merely immanent and material dimension serves to safeguard the common good of
believers and non-believers alike and establishes the basis on which those with
the least voice in society are themselves defended by such a vision.
A
correct understanding of the nature of freedom of religion or belief
appreciates that this pinnacle of human freedom is an inalienable right rooted
in the transcendent dignity of the human person which can never be superseded
by apparently competing rights. It includes, at both individual and collective
levels, not only freedom of worship but also the freedom to follow one’s
conscience in religious matters and the freedom to live coherently by
manifesting one’s views in public. Participating States’ commitments to pursue
freedom of religion or belief certainly includes the duty to protect adequately
public manifestations of religious belief.
We
note with distress that there are already many warning signs which indicate
that freedom of religion lies at risk of becoming more and more limited, while
the human rights of those who wish to profess and practise their faith freely,
including Christians in particular, are often not guaranteed. We have already
heard even from some of the highest instances in society that religious
institutions, more concretely the Catholic Church, must change teachings or
positions regarding the human person. History already demonstrates abundantly
how tragic and ultimately futile similar attempts have proved to be. Christians
must be enabled to participate fully in public life on an equal footing with
other human beings, be they members of other religions or non-believers.
Far
from being a mere concession of the state or society, freedom of religion is an
inalienable and universal human right. It should be clear that the state’s
obligation is only to acknowledge and protect, but not to grant, the right to
freedom of religion and its free and full exercise. International law
recognizes that freedom of conscience and religion belongs to the essential
core of natural rights which positive law can never legitimately deny. The
right to freedom of religion or belief derives from the unique dignity of the
human person created in the image of God and endowed with reason and free will.
One should, also, at all times keep in mind that the right to freedom of
religion is intrinsically related to the right to freedom of expression.
Mr.
Moderator,
In
this regard, it is essential to appreciate that religions are not simply sets
of norms or teachings but are living communities based on faith or belief, and
their freedom guarantees their contribution of moral values without which the
freedom of everyone is not possible. They are not to be considered a foreign
body within society, but rather as representing its vital parts. Indeed,
recognizing the freedom of religion of individuals or communities does not
limit others’ freedom. On the contrary, the acceptance of the religious freedom
of other persons and groups is the cornerstone of dialogue and cooperation and
guarantee of all other freedoms, including freedom of expression and peaceful
assembly and association. If freedom of religion is not respected, inevitably
many other freedoms will be eroded as well.
Thank
you, Mr. Moderator
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét