Trang

Thứ Tư, 10 tháng 6, 2026

JUNE 11, 2026: MEMORIAL OF SAINT BARNABAS, APOSTLE

 June 11, 2026

Memorial of Saint Barnabas, Apostle

Lectionary: 580/362

 


Reading 1

Acts 11:21b-26; 13:1-3

In those days a great number who believed turned to the Lord.
The news about them reached the ears of the Church in Jerusalem,
and they sent Barnabas to go to Antioch.
When he arrived and saw the grace of God,
he rejoiced and encouraged them all
to remain faithful to the Lord in firmness of heart,
for he was a good man, filled with the Holy Spirit and faith.
And a large number of people was added to the Lord.
Then he went to Tarsus to look for Saul,
and when he had found him he brought him to Antioch.
For a whole year they met with the Church
and taught a large number of people,
and it was in Antioch that the disciples
were first called Christians.

Now there were in the Church at Antioch prophets and teachers:
Barnabas, Symeon who was called Niger,
Lucius of Cyrene,
Manaen who was a close friend of Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.
While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said,
“Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul
for the work to which I have called them.”
Then, completing their fasting and prayer,
they laid hands on them and sent them off.
 

Responsorial Psalm

Psalm 98:1, 2-3ab, 3cd-4, 5-6

R. (see 2b) The Lord has revealed to the nations his saving power.
Sing to the LORD a new song,
for he has done wondrous deeds;
His right hand has won victory for him,
his holy arm.
R. The Lord has revealed to the nations his saving power.
The LORD has made his salvation known:
in the sight of the nations he has revealed his justice.
He has remembered his kindness and his faithfulness
toward the house of Israel.
R. The Lord has revealed to the nations his saving power.
All the ends of the earth have seen
the salvation by our God.
Sing joyfully to the LORD, all you lands;
break into song; sing praise.
R. The Lord has revealed to the nations his saving power.
Sing praise to the LORD with the harp,
with the harp and melodious song.
With trumpets and the sound of the horn
sing joyfully before the King, the LORD.
R. The Lord has revealed to the nations his saving power.
 

Alleluia

John 13:34

R. Alleluia, alleluia.
I give you a new commandment:
love one another as I have loved you.
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
 

Gospel

Matthew 5:20-26

Jesus said to his disciples: 
"I tell you, unless your righteousness surpasses that
of the scribes and Pharisees,
you will not enter into the Kingdom of heaven.

"You have heard that it was said to your ancestors,
You shall not kill; and whoever kills will be liable to judgment.
But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother
will be liable to judgment,
and whoever says to his brother, Raqa,
will be answerable to the Sanhedrin,
and whoever says, 'You fool,' will be liable to fiery Gehenna.
Therefore, if you bring your gift to the altar,
and there recall that your brother
has anything against you,
leave your gift there at the altar,
go first and be reconciled with your brother,
and then come and offer your gift.
Settle with your opponent quickly while on the way to court with him.
Otherwise your opponent will hand you over to the judge,
and the judge will hand you over to the guard,
and you will be thrown into prison.
Amen, I say to you,
you will not be released until you have paid the last penny."
 

https://bible.usccb.org/bible/readings/061126.cfm

 


Saint Barnabas, Apostle 

 

Commentary on Acts 11:21-26, 13:1-3

As described in verses just prior to today’s First Reading, the results of the early persecution were to scatter the Jewish Christians to places like Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch. Phoenicia was a country about 15 miles wide and 120 miles long stretching along the northeastern Mediterranean coast (corresponding to modern Lebanon). Its important cities were Tyre and Sidon, which are mentioned in the Gospels.  The Phoenicians were legendary seafarers.

Cyprus is an island in the north-eastern Mediterranean and was the home of Barnabas the Apostle. Antioch, on the river Orontes, was the capital of the Roman province of Syria, and the third largest city of the empire after Rome and Alexandria. It was 25 km (15 miles) inland from the northeast corner of the Mediterranean.  The first mainly gentile local church was located here.  In many ways, it would become the headquarters for the mission to the Gentiles, and from here, Paul (in today’s reading still called “Saul”) would launch his three missionary journeys—more about them later.

Today we have the story of the Church’s being founded in Antioch in Syria.  Chronologically, it was an immediate sequel to the martyrdom of Stephen and the savage persecution which followed and scattered the Jerusalem Christians in many directions.  However, in between these readings, we have been looking at the work of the deacon Philip and Peter’s involvement with the Gentiles.  We also saw the conversion of Saul, which is presumed to have already taken place.

At first the refugees only evangelised their fellow-Jews.  But then Jewish Christians from places like Cyprus and Cyrene, on the north coast of Africa, who were used to more pluralistic societies, also began to approach “Hellenists”, i.e. Greeks who were not circumcised—in other words, non-Jews.  These people responded very well and many became disciples of the Lord Jesus.

They used the term “Lord” Jesus rather than “Christ”, which was a title more suited to Jewish audiences with messianic expectations.  With the non-Jews, Jesus was more usually called “Lord”.  He is “Lord” because, elevated to God’s right hand, he now rules over the Kingdom which he inaugurated:

The hand of the Lord was with them, and a great number became believers and turned to the Lord.

This showed God’s approval and blessing on their work, sometimes indicated by signs and wonders.  It was the beginning of the ‘church’ at Antioch, one of many ‘churches’ to be set up in the following years.

When all this came to the ears of the people in Jerusalem, who were still thinking primarily in terms of Christians only as Jews, they sent Barnabas to investigate.  Jerusalem, where the Apostles were centred, had a right of supervision over other churches.  And so, the sending of Barnabas was in keeping with Jerusalem’s policy of sending leaders to check on new ministries coming to their attention.  As a Hellenistic Jew from Cyprus, Barnabas was an obvious choice for this mission.

It is clear that Barnabas was very happy with what he found:

When he came and saw the grace of God, he rejoiced, and he exhorted them all to remain faithful to the Lord with steadfast devotion…

He saw clearly that the gentile converts were very genuine, and encouraged the local church to continue what it was doing. About Barnabas, Luke comments in Acts:

…he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith.

These are similar words that had also been used to describe Stephen.

Then, Barnabas went off to Tarsus, a city in the province of Cilicia, in what is now the south-eastern corner of Turkey, and brought Saul back to Antioch. Saul had been forced to return to Tarsus after his conversion because the Christians would not believe in its genuineness.  They believed he was simply trying to infiltrate the Christian communities with the intention of destroying them. In Antioch, this resulted in even greater numbers joining the church community under the leadership and formation of Saul and Barnabas, who stayed on for a whole year in the city.

Once again we see innovation and new ground coming from the fringe rather than from the centre and how, after discernment, it is seen to be a valid development.  In our Church today, it is still the fringe which pioneers, while the role of Rome is to consolidate.

It is also an example of the phrase: “The world writes the agenda for the Church.”  It was the influence of a local situation which led to the new insights that were seen as a valid development of the Christian vision.

It was here, too, we are told that the “disciples”, that is, the followers of Jesus’ Way, were first given the nickname “Christians”. This also indicates that those who first coined the term took ‘Christ’ to be a personal name rather than a title.  It is not certain whether the followers adopted the name themselves, or whether it was used by enemies as a term of contempt.

In either case, it is a fitting title for those who attach themselves to Jesus and his Way, and we too should be proud of this nickname. It is not something we should hide, nor is it a name that we should dishonour by our behaviour—and still less wear lightly.

The reading then names the “prophets and teachers” in the Church at Antioch. It ends with the Holy Spirit’s coming upon them all “while they were worshiping the Lord and fasting” and saying:

Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.

Then they “were sent off”. Although Barnabas and Saul would later split up (over a disagreement as to whether John Mark should accompany them), these two proclaimed the Word of the Lord far and wide on their missionary journeys as the Apostles to the Gentiles.

Comments Off

 


Commentary on Matthew 5:20-26

In today’s reading continuing the Sermon on the Mount, what Jesus means by saying that he has not come to abolish the old Law but to transcend it is made clear by Jesus’ giving six examples of how a number of Old Testament sayings are to be understood by his followers. In fact, he says that if we wish to be his followers and do his work, we must move forward to the deeper level of understanding he proposes:

For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

It is clear from what we see of the scribes and Pharisees in the Gospels, that for them, religious virtue consisted in the most exact external observance of every detail of Jewish Law. The more perfect the observance of the letter of the Law, they argued, the closer one was to God. Jesus challenged that understanding and it led to serious confrontations with the religious leadership.

Of course, the way of the scribes and Pharisees has its attractions. It is a much easier way to measure one’s obedience to God. And one finds the same among other religions today. Among Christians (including Catholics), one finds that there are some people who are very anxious to know whether a certain action ‘is a sin’ or not. Such an approach leads in many cases to scrupulosity and fear, finding sin even in minutiae. God becomes a menacing shadow ready to strike at the smallest wrongdoing.

When speaking of the Jewish law, the first example Jesus gives is of the commandment:

You shall not murder [kill]. (Exodus 20:13)

Jesus’ understanding of this commandment goes far beyond the actual killing of another person. He extends it even to anger and abusive language. And anger can often be totally locked inside and invisible to an outsider. Jesus says:

But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment, and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council, and if you say, ‘You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire.

In other words, Jesus excludes any kind of violent behaviour towards a brother or sister, either in action, or word, or even thought.

He also links our interpersonal behaviour to our relationship to God. It is no good, then, piously bringing our offering to the altar in the Temple and presenting it to God while we are—through our own fault—in conflict with a brother or sister. We cannot separate our relationship with God and with that of a brother or sister. This will be spelt out in other parts of the Gospel. Before we make our offering, we must first be reconciled with our offended brother or sister and only then, after the injury has been healed, make our offering. Jesus also recommends early reconciliation if only to avoid greater troubles later on. It is not worth going to jail simply out of hatred or anger towards another.

All this is very relevant to us. Whenever we celebrate the Eucharist, we should recall what Jesus says in this text and put it into practice. Before we make our offering of the bread and wine, we are invited, at the beginning of the Eucharist, to confess our sins to God and to the gathered community:

I confess to almighty God and to you, my brothers and sisters, that I have sinned…

How often do we really think about what we are saying at this time?

Again, before sharing with others in the Body and Blood of the Lord, we pray:

…forgive us our sins as we forgive those who offend us…

And we are also invited to make a sign of peace with all those around us. For how can we share in the Body and Blood of the Lord if we are at enmity with a brother or sister who is a member of that same Body? But again, so often this is just an empty gesture, with very little real meaning and, for the most part, made to someone we do not even know. Let us work to put the meaning back into what can so easily degenerate into a meaningless ritual.

Comments Off

 

https://livingspace.sacredspace.ie/O2105g/

 

 


Thursday, June 11, 2026

10th Week in Ordinary Time

Opening Prayer

God of wisdom and love, source of all good, send your Spirit to teach us your truth and guide our actions in your way of peace.

We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

Gospel Reading - Matthew 5: 20-26

Jesus said to his disciples: 'For I tell you, if your uprightness does not surpass that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never get into the kingdom of Heaven.

'You have heard how it was said to our ancestors, You shall not kill; and if anyone does kill he must answer for it before the court. But I say this to you, anyone who is angry with a brother will answer for it before the court; anyone who calls a brother "Fool" will answer for it before the Sanhedrin; and anyone who calls him "Traitor" will answer for it in hell fire.

So then, if you are bringing your offering to the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar, go and be reconciled with your brother first, and then come back and present your offering.

Come to terms with your opponent in good time while you are still on the way to the court with him, or he may hand you over to the judge and the judge to the officer, and you will be thrown into prison. In truth I tell you, you will not get out till you have paid the last penny.'

Reflection

The text of today’s Gospel is placed in a lager unity: Mt 5: 20 to Mt 5: 48. In this Matthew shows us how Jesus interpreted and explained the Law of God. Five times he repeats the phrase: “You have heard how it was said to our ancestors, but I say to you!” (Mt 5: 21, 27, 33, 38, 43). According to some Pharisees, Jesus was eliminating the law. But it was exactly the contrary. He said: “Do not imagine that I have come to abolish the Law and the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete them” (Mt 5: 17). Before the Law of Moses, Jesus has an attitude of rupture and of continuity. He breaks away from the mistaken interpretation which was closed up in the prison of the letter, but he affirms categorically the last objective of the law: to attain to the greatest justice, which is Love.

In the communities for which Matthew writes his Gospel there were diverse opinions concerning the Law of Moses. For some, it no longer had any sense, for others it should be observed even up to the minimum details. Because of this there were many conflicts and disputes. Some said of the others that they were stupid and idiot. Matthew tries to help both groups to better understand the true sense of the Law and presents some counsels of Jesus to help them face and overcome the conflicts which arose within the families and the communities.

           Matthew 5: 20: Your justice should surpass that of the Pharisees. This first verse gives the general key to everything which follows in Mt 5: 20-48. The Evangelist indicates to the communities how they should practice a greater justice which surpasses the justice of the Scribes and the Pharisees and which leads to the full observance of the law. Then, after this general key on a greater justice, Matthew quotes five very concrete examples of how to practice the Law, in such a way that its observance leads to the perfect practice of love. In the first example of today’s Gospel, Jesus reveals what God wanted in giving Moses the fifth commandment, “Do not kill!”

           Matthew 5: 21-22: Do not kill. “You have heard how it was said to our ancestors, you shall not kill and if anyone does kill, he must answer for it before the court." (Ex. 20: 13). To observe fully this fifth commandment, it is not sufficient to avoid murdering. It is necessary to uproot from within oneself everything which in one way or other can lead to murder, for example, anger, hatred, the desire of vengeance, exploitation, etc. “anyone who is angry with his brother will answer for it before the court”. That is, anyone who is angry against the brother merits or deserves the same punishment of condemnation by the court which, according to the ancient law, was reserved to the murderer! But Jesus goes beyond all this. He wants to uproot the origin of murder: “Anyone who calls a brother ‘Fool’ will answer for it before the Sanhedrin; and anyone who calls him ‘Traitor’ will answer for it in hell fire”. In other words, I observe truly the commandment “Not to kill if I succeed to take away from my heart any sentiment of anger which leads to insult the brother. That is, if I attain the perfection of love.

           Matthew 5: 23-24: The perfect worship wanted by God. “If you are bringing your offering to the altar and there you remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar, go and be reconciled with your brother first, and then come back sand present your offering”. In order to be accepted by God, and be united to him, it is necessary to be reconciled with the brother, with the sister. Before the destruction of the Temple, in the year 70, when the Christians still participated in the pilgrimages to Jerusalem to take their offering to the altar of the Temple, they always remembered this phrase of Jesus. Now in the years 80’s, in the moment in which Matthew writes, the Temple and the Altar no longer existed. The community itself had become the Temple and the Altar of God (1

Co 3: 16).

           Matthew 5: 25-26: To be reconciled. One of the points on which the Gospel of Matthew insists the most is reconciliation, because in the communities of that time there were many tensions among the groups which had different tendencies, without any dialogue. Nobody wanted to give in or cede before the other. Matthew enlightens this situation with words of Jesus on reconciliation which demand acceptance and understanding. Because the only sin which God does not forgive is our lack of forgiveness of others (Mt 6: 14). For this reason, he seeks reconciliation first, before it is too late.

           The ideal of greatest justice. Five times, Jesus quotes a commandment or a usage of the ancient law: Do not kill. (Mt 5: 21), Do not commit adultery (Mt 5: 27), Do not bear false witness (Mt 5: 33), Eye for eye, tooth for tooth 5: 38), To love neighbor and to hate the enemy (Mt 5: 43). And five times he criticizes the ancient way of observing these commandments and he indicates a new way to attain justice, the objective of the law (Mt 5: 22-26; 5: 28-32; 5: 34-37; 5: 39-42; 5: 44-48). The word Justice is present seven times in the Gospel of Matthew (Mt 3: 15; 5: 6, 10, 20; 6: 1, 33; 21: 32). The religious ideal of the Jews of that time was “to be just before God”. The Pharisees taught: “A person attains justice before God when he/she observes all the norms of the Law in all the details!” This teaching resulted in a legalistic oppression and produced much anguish in persons of good will, because it was very difficult for a person to be able to observe all the norms (Rm 7: 21-24). This is why Matthew takes some words of Jesus on justice showing that this leads to surpass the justice of the Pharisees (Mt 5: 20). For Jesus, justice does not come from what I do for God observing the law, but from what God does for me, accepting me with love, like a son, like a daughter. The new ideal that Jesus proposes is this: "To be perfect as the Heavenly Father is perfect!” (Mt 5: 48). That means: I will be just before God, if I try to accept and to forgive persons as God accepts and forgives me gratuitously in spite of my many defects and sins.

Personal Questions

           Which are the more frequent conflicts in my family? And in our community? Is reconciliation easy in the family and in the community? Yes or no? Why?

           The advice of Jesus, how can this help me to improve relationships in the sphere of our family and of the community?

Concluding Prayer

Lord, you visit the earth and make it fruitful, you fill it with riches; the river of God brims over with water, you provide the grain. (Ps 65: 9)

www.ocarm.org

 

 


Saint Barnabas, Apostle

 

Barnabas (whose original name was Joseph) was born of Jewish parents on the island of Cyprus about the beginning of the Christian Era. As a Levite (from which tribe the Temple priests came), he naturally spent much time in Jerusalem, probably even before the death of Jesus. He even seems to have settled there, where his relatives (the family of John Mark) had their homes (Acts 12:12). As well, he also had land which, following his conversion, he sold and donated the proceeds to the Christian community (Acts 4:36-37). Probably because of his success as a preacher he was given the name Barnabas, meaning “son of encouragement or consolation” by the community. Though little is known of his early life in the Church, he seems to have been a person of some influence in the community.

When Saul, now preaching Christ as Saviour, had to flee from Jews in Damascus, he went to Jerusalem where the Christians did not want to approach him, being highly suspicious of the genuineness of his conversion. It was Barnabas who brought Saul to the leaders and guaranteed Saul’s conversion as real (Acts 9:27), although Saul (by then called Paul) said later on that he had only met Peter and James on that occasion (Galatians 1:18-19). Saul, probably feeling he was not yet accepted, then withdrew to his home town of Tarsus, while Barnabas seems to have remained in Jerusalem.

The event that brought them together again and opened to both the door to their lifework was ironically an indirect result of Saul’s own persecution. Among those who fled Jerusalem were some Christians from Cyprus and Cyrene who began preaching the Gospel to non-Jews in Antioch with great effect (Acts 11:20). When the news reached the leaders in Jerusalem, they sent Barnabas (who was a Cypriot himself) to investigate. Although a Jew, he saw the hand of God in what was going on. He then went to Tarsus to look for his friend Saul and persuaded him to go back with him to Antioch. Together they spent a whole year in Antioch preaching and labouring at Antioch and “taught a great many people”.

About this time too, when a severe famine struck Jerusalem, the Christians at Antioch made a collection and sent it to Jerusalem with Barnabas and Saul. (At this point in the story, Barnabas is being mentioned before Saul.) At the end of their mission, they returned to Antioch, bringing Barnabas’ cousin, John Mark, with them.

The church at Antioch now felt emboldened to reach further afield. So Barnabas and Saul, together with John Mark, were sent on what is now called Paul’s First Missionary Journey. They went first to preach the Gospel in Barnabas’ homeland, Cyprus, and then moved to Perge in Pampyhilia on the mainland (South Turkey today). Here John Mark left them; the reason is not given, but we know Saul felt it was a kind of desertion. From here the two Apostles continued inland visiting a number of towns. They usually evangelised their fellow Jews first in each place, but often met with fierce opposition and then would turn to the Gentiles. At Lystra, after they cured a lame man, they were taken for gods (Paul for Hermes or Mercury and Barnabas for Jupiter), but when the Apostles told them to stop, the crowd turned against them and Saul was attacked and left for dead. They then retraced their route and set up Christian communities with local leaders in each place. On reaching Antioch again, they reported to their community on how God:

…had opened the door of faith to the Gentiles. (Acts 14:27)

However, some of the Christians in Jerusalem were not happy with what they had heard and were insisting that circumcision was obligatory on all non-Jewish converts. This led to the ‘Council of Jerusalem’ where the Christians from Antioch defended their policy and in the end won the approval of the whole assembly. But it was not quite the end of the controversy. Peter, after being criticised for socialising with Gentiles, stopped doing so and so apparently did Barnabas. For this they were publicly criticised by Paul.

Soon after this, Paul (now mentioned first) and Barnabas decided to repeat their earlier missionary journey. However, Barnabas wanted to take his cousin John Mark with them. Paul disagreed strongly, so they split. Paul continued on with Silas while Barnabas with Mark went to their native Cyprus.

From this time on, we know little or nothing of Barnabas’ life story. He still seems to be working as an Apostle in the year 56 or 57. In 1 Corinthians (9:6) we learn that he is earning his own living, with the indication that he is on good terms with Paul. Later, we know that John Mark, in another sign of reconciliation, was with Paul (who was then a prisoner in Rome during the years 61-63). John Mark’s presence has been taken as an indication that Barnabas is no longer alive.

Various traditions tell of Barnabas as the first Bishop of Milan, preaching at Alexandria and Rome. He is said to have converted Rome’s fourth bishop, St Clement and, finally, to have suffered martyrdom in his native Cyprus. None of these stories can be validated. Tertullian (with little support) thinks Barnabas wrote the Letter to the Hebrews, and there is also an Epistle of Barnabas attributed to him. After the Twelve and Paul, Barnabas is one of the most esteemed figures among the first generation of Christians. Luke, in a rare moment of candour, speaks of Barnabas with affection, saying:

…he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith.
(Acts 11:24)

Barnabas is remembered not only for his missionary zeal but for his openness (as a Jew) to the Gentiles, and for his seeing in the former fanatical Pharisee, Saul, the potential to be a great Apostle for Christ and the gospel.

Comments Off

 

https://livingspace.sacredspace.ie/f0611s/

 

 

11.06.2026: THỨ NĂM TUẦN X THƯỜNG NIÊN

 11/06/2026

 Thứ Năm tuần 10 thường niên

Thánh Banaba, tông đồ.

 Lễ nhớ.

 


* Thánh nhân quê ở đảo Sýp. Ít lâu sau lễ Ngũ Tuần, người có mặt trong cộng đoàn Giêrusalem, rồi ở Antiôkia, nơi người đã giới thiệu ông Saolê thành Tácxô với các anh em.

Người đã cùng với ông Phaolô đi loan báo Tin Mừng cho Tiểu Á, nhưng sau người trở lại đảo Sýp. Thánh Banaba, với cái nhìn rộng rãi, khoáng đạt, đã giữ vai trò chủ yếu trong tiến trình truyền giáo của Hội Thánh.

 

Bài Ðọc I: Cv 11, 21b-26; 13, 1-3

“Họ cũng rao giảng Chúa Giê-su cho người Hy-lạp”.

Trích sách Tông đồ Công vụ.

Trong những ngày ấy, có đông người tin trở về với Chúa. Tin đó thấu tai Hội Thánh Giê-ru-sa-lem, nên người ta sai Barnaba đến An-ti-ô-ki-a. Khi đến nơi và thấy việc ơn Chúa thực hiện, ông vui mừng và khuyên bảo mọi người hãy vững lòng tin nơi Chúa; Barnaba vốn là người tốt lành, đầy Thánh Thần và lòng tin. Và có đoàn người đông đảo tin theo Chúa. Vậy Barnaba đi Tar-xê tìm Sao-lô. Gặp được rồi, liền đưa Sao-lô về An-ti-ô-ki-a. Cả hai ở lại tại Hội Thánh đó trọn một năm, giảng dạy cho quần chúng đông đảo; chính tại An-ti-ô-ki-a mà các môn đệ lần đầu tiên nhận tên là “Ki-tô hữu”.

Bấy giờ trong Hội Thánh An-ti-ô-ki-a có những tiên tri và tiến sĩ, trong số đó có Barnaba, Simon cũng gọi là Ni-gê, Lu-xi-ô người thành Xy-rê-nê, Ma-na-hê bạn của vua Hê-rô-đê lúc còn thư ấu, và Sao-lô.

Ðang khi các ông làm việc thờ phượng Chúa và ăn chay, thì Thánh Thần phán bảo các ông rằng: “Hãy để riêng Sao-lô và Barnaba cho Ta, để làm công việc mà Ta đã chỉ định”. Vậy sau khi ăn chay cầu nguyện, họ đặt tay trên hai ông và tiễn đưa hai ông lên đường.

Ðó là lời Chúa.

 

Ðáp Ca: Tv 97, 1. 2-3a. 3cd-4. 5-6

Ðáp: Chúa đã công bố ơn cứu độ trước mặt chư dân (c. 2a).

Xướng: Hãy ca tụng Chúa một bài ca mới, vì Người đã thực hiện những việc lạ lùng. Tay mặt Người đã đem lại toàn thắng, cùng với cánh tay thánh thiện của Người.

Xướng: Chúa đã công bố ơn cứu độ, đã tỏ sự công chính Người trước mặt chư dân. Người đã nhớ lại lòng nhân hậu và trung thành đối nhà Israel..

Xướng: Mọi dân trên khắp cùng bờ cõi trái đất đã nhìn thấy ơn cứu độ của Thiên Chúa chúng tôi. Toàn thể địa cầu hãy hân hoan mừng Chúa, hãy vui mừng hoan lạc và đàn ca.

Xướng: Hãy ca mừng Chúa với đàn cầm thụ, với đàn cầm thụ, với nhạc cụ râm ran: Hãy thổi sáo và rúc tù và, hân hoan trước thánh nhan Chúa là Vua.

 

Alleluia:

Alleluia, alleluia! – Chúng con ca ngợi Thiên Chúa, chúng con tuyên xưng Chúa; lạy Chúa, ca đoàn vinh quang của các Tông đồ ca ngợi Chúa. Alleluia.

 

Phúc Âm: Mt 10, 7-13

“Các con đã lãnh nhận nhưng không, thì hãy cho nhưng không“.

Tin Mừng Chúa Giê-su Ki-tô theo Thánh Mát-thêu.

Khi ấy, Chúa Giê-su phán cùng các Tông đồ rằng: “Các con hãy đi rao giảng rằng: Nước Trời đã gần đến. Hãy chữa những bệnh nhân, hãy làm cho kẻ chết sống lại, hãy làm cho những kẻ phong cùi được sạch và hãy trừ quỷ: Các con đã lãnh nhận nhưng không thì hãy cho nhưng không.

“Các con chớ mang vàng, bạc, tiền nong trong đai lưng, chớ mang bị đi đường, chớ đem theo hai áo choàng, chớ mang giày dép và gậy gộc: vì thợ thì đáng được nuôi ăn. Khi các con vào thành hay làng nào, hãy hỏi ở nơi đó ai là người xứng đáng, thì ở lại đó cho tới lúc ra đi.

“Khi vào nhà nào, các con hãy chào rằng: “Bình an cho nhà này”. Nếu nhà ấy xứng đáng thì sự bình an của các con sẽ đến với nhà ấy; còn nếu nhà ấy không xứng đáng, thì sự bình an của các con sẽ trở về với các con”.

Ðó là lời Chúa.

 


Chú giải về Công vụ Tông đồ 11,21-26; 13,1-3

Như được mô tả trong các câu ngay trước Bài đọc thứ nhất hôm nay, kết quả của cuộc bách hại ban đầu là khiến các tín hữu Do Thái phân tán đến những nơi như Phoenicia, Síp và Antioch. Phoenicia là một quốc gia rộng khoảng 15 dặm và dài 120 dặm trải dài dọc theo bờ biển phía đông bắc Địa Trung Hải (tương ứng với Liban ngày nay). Các thành phố quan trọng của nó là Tyre và Sidon, được nhắc đến trong các sách Phúc Âm. Người Phoenicia nổi tiếng là những người đi biển tài ba.

Síp là một hòn đảo ở phía đông bắc Địa Trung Hải và là quê hương của sứ đồ Barnabas. Antioch, nằm trên sông Orontes, là thủ đô của tỉnh Syria thuộc La Mã, và là thành phố lớn thứ ba của đế chế sau Rome và Alexandria. Nó nằm cách góc đông bắc Địa Trung Hải 25 km (15 dặm) về phía đất liền. Hội thánh địa phương đầu tiên chủ yếu là người ngoại đạo được đặt tại đây. Về nhiều mặt, nơi đây sẽ trở thành trụ sở cho sứ mệnh truyền giáo cho dân ngoại, và từ đây, Phaolô (trong bài đọc hôm nay vẫn được gọi là “Sao-lô”) sẽ bắt đầu ba chuyến hành trình truyền giáo của mình—chúng ta sẽ nói thêm về chúng sau.

Hôm nay chúng ta có câu chuyện về việc Giáo hội được thành lập tại Antioch thuộc Syria. Về mặt thời gian, đó là sự kiện tiếp theo ngay sau khi Stêphanô tử đạo và cuộc bách hại tàn bạo sau đó đã khiến các tín hữu Kitô giáo ở Giêrusalem bị phân tán khắp nơi. Tuy nhiên, giữa những bài đọc này, chúng ta đã xem xét công việc của phó tế Philipphê và sự tham gia của Phê-rô với dân ngoại. Chúng ta cũng đã thấy sự cải đạo của Sao-lô, điều được cho là đã diễn ra trước đó.

Ban đầu, những người tị nạn chỉ truyền giáo cho những người Do Thái đồng hương của họ. Nhưng sau đó, các tín hữu Kitô giáo gốc Do Thái từ những nơi như Síp và Cyrene, trên bờ biển phía bắc châu Phi, những người quen với các xã hội đa nguyên hơn, cũng bắt đầu tiếp cận những người “Hy Lạp hóa”, tức là những người Hy Lạp không chịu phép cắt bì—nói cách khác, những người không phải là người Do Thái. Những người này đã đáp lại rất tốt và nhiều người đã trở thành môn đệ của Chúa Giêsu.

Họ dùng danh xưng “Chúa Giê-su” thay vì “Đấng Ki-tô”, một danh xưng phù hợp hơn với khán giả Do Thái có kỳ vọng về Đấng Mê-si-a. Với những người không phải là người Do Thái, Chúa Giê-su thường được gọi là “Chúa”. Ngài là “Chúa” bởi vì, được tôn lên bên hữu Đức Chúa Trời, Ngài giờ đây cai trị Vương quốc mà Ngài đã thiết lập:

Bàn tay của Chúa ở cùng họ, và rất nhiều người đã tin và quay về với Chúa.

Điều này cho thấy sự chấp thuận và ban phước của Đức Chúa Trời đối với công việc của họ, đôi khi được biểu hiện bằng các dấu kỳ phép lạ. Đó là sự khởi đầu của ‘giáo hội’ tại An-ti-ốt, một trong nhiều ‘giáo hội’ sẽ được thành lập trong những năm tiếp theo.

Khi tất cả những điều này đến tai người dân Giê-ru-sa-lem, những người vẫn chủ yếu nghĩ về Ki-tô hữu chỉ như là người Do Thái, họ đã phái Ba-na-ba đi điều tra. Giê-ru-sa-lem, nơi các Tông đồ tập trung, có quyền giám sát các giáo hội khác. Vì vậy, việc phái Ba-na-ba phù hợp với chính sách của Giê-ru-sa-lem là phái các nhà lãnh đạo đi kiểm tra các mục vụ mới đến tai họ. Là một người Do Thái theo văn hóa Hy Lạp từ Síp, Barnabas là sự lựa chọn hiển nhiên cho sứ mệnh này.

Rõ ràng là Barnabas rất vui mừng với những gì ông thấy:

Khi đến và thấy ân điển của Đức Chúa Trời, ông vui mừng và khuyên nhủ mọi người hãy trung thành với Chúa bằng lòng tận hiến bền vững…

Ông thấy rõ rằng những người ngoại đạo cải đạo rất chân thành, và khuyến khích hội thánh địa phương tiếp tục công việc của họ. Về Barnabas, Lu-ca bình luận trong sách Công vụ:

…ông là một người tốt, đầy Thánh Linh và đức tin.

Đây là những lời tương tự cũng được dùng để miêu tả Stê-phan.

 

Sau đó, Barnabas đi đến Tarsus, một thành phố thuộc tỉnh Cilicia, nay thuộc góc đông nam của Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ, và đưa Sao-lô trở lại Antioch. Sao-lô đã bị buộc phải trở lại Tarsus sau khi cải đạo vì các tín đồ Ki-tô giáo không tin vào tính chân thành của ông. Họ tin rằng ông chỉ đang cố gắng thâm nhập vào các cộng đồng Ki tô với ý định tiêu diệt họ. Tại Antioch, điều này dẫn đến việc số lượng người gia nhập cộng đồng giáo hội dưới sự lãnh đạo và hình thành của Sao-lô và Barnabas còn đông hơn nữa, những người đã ở lại thành phố suốt một năm.

Một lần nữa, chúng ta thấy sự đổi mới và những hướng đi mới đến từ vùng ngoại vi hơn là từ trung tâm, và sau khi phân định, nó được xem là một sự phát triển hợp lệ. Trong Giáo hội ngày nay, chính vùng ngoại vi vẫn là nơi tiên phong, trong khi vai trò của Rôma là củng cố.

Đây cũng là một ví dụ về câu nói: “Thế giới viết nên chương trình nghị sự cho Giáo hội”. Chính ảnh hưởng của hoàn cảnh địa phương đã dẫn đến những hiểu biết mới được xem là một sự phát triển hợp lệ của tầm nhìn Kitô giáo.

Cũng chính tại đây, chúng ta được biết rằng các “môn đệ”, tức là những người theo Con đường của Chúa Giê-su, lần đầu tiên được gọi bằng biệt danh “Kitô hữu”. Điều này cũng cho thấy rằng những người đầu tiên đặt ra thuật ngữ này đã coi “Kitô hữu” là một tên riêng chứ không phải là một danh hiệu. Không chắc chắn liệu những người theo Chúa tự nguyện sử dụng tên gọi này hay nó được kẻ thù sử dụng như một thuật ngữ miệt thị.

Trong cả hai trường hợp, đó đều là một danh hiệu thích hợp cho những người gắn bó với Chúa Giê-su và Con Đường của Ngài, và chúng ta cũng nên tự hào về biệt danh này. Đó không phải là điều chúng ta nên che giấu, cũng không phải là một cái tên mà chúng ta nên làm ô nhục bằng hành vi của mình—và càng không nên xem nhẹ.

Bài đọc sau đó nêu tên các “tiên tri và thày dạy” trong Giáo hội tại Antioch. Nó kết thúc bằng việc Đức Thánh Linh giáng xuống trên tất cả họ “trong khi họ đang thờ phượng Chúa và kiêng ăn” và phán rằng:

Hãy biệt riêng cho Ta Barnabas và Sao-lô cho công việc mà Ta đã gọi họ.

Rồi họ “được sai đi”. Mặc dù Barnabas và Sao-lô sau này sẽ chia tay nhau (vì bất đồng về việc liệu Gioan Mác-cô có nên đi cùng họ hay không), nhưng hai người này đã rao giảng Lời Chúa rộng khắp trong các chuyến truyền giáo của họ với tư cách là các Sứ đồ cho dân ngoại.

 

(theo livingspace)

 


Suy niệm: Người con có biệt tài khuyên nhủ

Hôm nay Giáo Hội kính nhớ thánh Barnaba tông đồ. Là một người Do Thái sinh trưởng tại đảo Sýp vào khởi đầu của đạo Kitô, Barnaba có tên là Giuse, thuộc dòng tộc Lêvi. Có lẽ thánh nhân từng sống tại Giêrusalem trước khi Chúa Giêsu chịu tử nạn. Vì nhiệt tình và sự thành công trong công tác rao giảng, cho nên thánh nhân được các thánh tông đồ tặng cho biệt hiệu là Barnaba, nghĩa là “người con có biệt tài khuyên nhủ hay an ủi”.

Sau khi trở lại, thánh Phaolô đến Giêrusalem, nhưng cộng đoàn tín hữu tại đây vẫn còn ngờ vực thiện chí của ngài.

Chính thánh Barnaba là người đứng ra bảo đảm và giới thiệu thánh Phaolô với các tông đồ, nhưng sau đó thánh Phaolô lui về ẩn dật trong nhà ngài tại Tácxô trong nhiều năm và Barnaba vẫn ở lại Giêrusalem. Sau này các thánh tông đồ sai Barnaba đến Antiokia để điều tra về sự thành công của thánh Phaolô trong công tác rao giảng Tin Mừng cho dân ngoại, Barnaba đã nhận ra ngay ơn Chúa trong công việc của thánh Phaolô. Ðây là lý do để nối kết hai người lại với nhau trong cánh đồng truyền giáo của dân ngoại. Cả hai sát cánh bên nhau tại Antiokia trong vòng một năm. Một trận đói lớn đã tàn phá Giêrusalem, Barnaba và Phaolô đã quyên góp để mang về Giêrusalem cứu trợ. Sau công tác này, cả hai trở về Antiokia và mang theo một người bà con họ hàng với Barnaba là Marcô, vị thánh sử tương lai.

Từ Antiokia, cùng với Marcô, Barnaba và Phaolô lên đường đi đến đảo Sýp, quê hương của Barnaba và từ đó sang Tiểu Á. Tại một trạm đầu tiên ở Tiểu Á, Marcô đã chia tay với Barnaba và Phaolô. Barnaba và Phaolô bắt đầu những trạm truyền giáo cam go nhất. Mỗi một bước đi là mỗi một lần bị chống đối và bách hại từ phía những người Do Thái. Những người này cũng xúi giục dân ngoại chống lại các vị tông đồ.

Tại Líttra, sau khi thánh Phaolô chữa lành một người tàn tật, dân thành xem các ngài như những vị thần. Họ định giết bò để tế cho các ngài nhưng liền sau đó bị người Do Thái xúi giục họ lại quay ra tấn công hai ngài. Riêng thánh Phaolô bị gây thương tích. Dù bị chống đối và bách hại, hai vị tông đồ vẫn hoán cải được nhiều người cũng như tổ chức được giáo đoàn. Bị người Do Thái và dân ngoại chống đối và bách hại, Barnaba và Phaolô còn gặp khó khăn ngay cả từ phía cộng đoàn Giêrusalem. Vấn đề xoay quanh việc có nên cắt bì cho dân ngoại không. Hai vị thánh này đã tranh đấu và cuối cùng đã tìm được giải pháp trong cộng đoàn Giêrusalem.

Về sau, trong chuyến đi trở lại để viếng thăm các cộng đoàn, Barnaba và Phaolô đã chia tay nhau mỗi người một ngả. Barnaba đi với Marcô đến Sýp; Thánh Phaolô cùng với một người môn đệ tên là Xila trở lại Tiểu Á. Những năm tháng còn lại của Barnaba không còn được nhắc đến nữa. Nhưng cũng như thánh Phaolô, thánh Barnaba vừa rao giảng Tin Mừng vừa tự lực cánh sinh. Khi thánh Phaolô bị giam tại Rôma, Marcô đã trở thành môn đệ của ngài. Ðiều này cho thấy rằng Barnaba không còn nữa.

Theo truyền thuyết, thánh Barnaba là vị giám mục đầu tiên của thành Milanô. Dù thế nào đi nữa, tất cả mọi truyền thuyết đều gặp nhau trong cùng một điểm là xem Barnaba như con người được mến chuộng nhất trong thế hệ Kitô đầu tiên. Trong sách Tông Ðồ Công Vụ, thánh sử Luca gọi ngài là một con người tốt, đầy tràn Chúa Thánh Thần. Thái độ của ngài đối với thánh Marcô chứng tỏ một trái tim nhân hậu và đại lượng.

(Trích trong ‘Mỗi Ngày Một Tin Vui’)

 

 


Ngày 11/6: Thánh Ba-na-ba – Tông đồ

1. Ghi nhận lịch sử – Phụng Vụ

Từ thế kỷ XI lễ nhớ thánh Barnaba được cử hành ngày 11 tháng 6 tại Rôma. Ngày tháng này được thống nhất chung cho cả Đông Phương lẫn Tây Phương, kỷ niệm ngày tìm thấy thi hài của người. Kinh Nguyện Thánh Thể của Giáo triều Rôma nêu tên Barnaba cùng với Stêphanô và Matthias.

Trong Công vụ Tông Đồ, ngài được gọi là Joseph và biệt hiệu là Barnaba (người có tài yên ủi). Ngài là một thầy Lêvi, quê quán ở đảo Cypre, xứng đáng mang danh “Tông Đồ” trong Giáo hội tiên khởi. Ngài lấy tiền bán đất đem đặt dưới chân các Tông Đồ (Cv 4, 37). Loan báo Tin Mừng ở Antiochia, thành phố thứ ba của đế quốc Rôma và đã tìm Phaolô thành Tarsus đến với cộng đoàn. Hơn một năm, ngài cùng Phaolô chuyên tâm rao giảng Tin Mừng cho cộng đoàn mới trong thành phố. Nơi đây, các tín hữu lần đầu tiên nhận danh hiệu “Ki-tô hữu”, nghĩa là “môn đệ của Đức Kitô” (tiếng Hy Lạp: Christianos).

Barnaba theo Phaolô trong cuộc hành trình truyền giáo thứ nhất (Cv13,2-4), đi khắp đảo Cypre và khắp bờ biển miền nam Tiểu Á. Nhưng sau Công đồng Giêrusalem, năm 49, Barnaba chia tay Phaolô để cùng người anh em họ Gioan Márcô trở lại đảo Cypre. Các tư liệu xưa cho chúng ta biết ngài đã qua Rôma và bị người Do Thái ném đá gần Salamine. Có lẽ người ta đã tìm thấy thi hài của ngài tại đó, vào thế kỷ V.

Truyền thống xem ngài là một trong bảy mươi môn đệ của Chúa và cho rằng ngài là tác giả Thư gửi tín hữu Do Thái, cũng như Thư của Barnaba, có lẽ gửi từ Alexandrie. Ngược lại, chắc người ta đã đọc trong Giáo hội tiên khởi một bản Tin Mừng mang tên ngài, nhưng bản Tin Mừng này đã không đến tay chúng ta.

2. Thông điệp và tính thời sự

a. Lời nguyện nhập lễ lấy lại lời ca ngợi của Công vụ khi gọi Barnaba là “Người đầy ơn Thánh Thần và lòng tin”: Khi tới nơi và thấy ơn Thiên Chúa như vậy, ông Barnaba mừng rỡ và khuyên nhủ ai nấy bền lòng gắn bó cùng Chúa, vì ông là người tốt, đầy ơn Thánh Thần và lòng tin (Cv 11, 24).

b. Lời nguyện trên lễ vật nhắc đến “tình yêu nồng nàn đã thúc đẩy Barnaba chuyển trao ánh sáng Tin Mừng cho các dân tộc ngoại giáo”. Trước lòng hăng say hoạt động Tông Đồ của Phaolô thành Tarsus, Barnaba không phải là người đứng bên lề do khiêm tốn giả tạo, nhưng ngài muốn dành cho Phaolô tác vụ rao giảng lời Chúa (Cv 14, 12 b). Còn về phần mình, ngài vẫn tiếp tục hợp tác, nêu gương sẵn sàng hy sinh phục vụ. Chính Barnaba là người đi tìm Phaolô ở Tarsus để đưa về Antiochia và cho hội nhập vào một cộng đoàn đang dè dặt nghi kỵ, trước khi cùng nhau đem Tin Mừng cho các dân tộc ngoại giáo sống ở các bờ biển phía nam Tiểu Á.

c. Khi nhắc đến việc Đức Giêsu sai các Tông Đồ ra đi truyền giáo: Dọc đường hãy rao giảng rằng: Nước trời đã đến gần…, bài Tin Mừng Thánh lễ (Mt 10,7-13) cũng gợi lại tinh thần hành động của Hội thánh dựa trên ý muốn của Đấng sáng lập, như được mô tả trong Công vụ (xem bài đọc một: Cv 11, 21..13, 3): Một hôm, đang khi họ làm việc thờ phượng Chúa và ăn chay, thì Thánh Thần phán bảo: “Hãy dành riêng Barnaba và Saolô cho Ta, để lo công việc Ta đã kêu gọi hai người ấy làm”. Bấy giờ họ ăn chay cầu nguyện, rồi đặt tay trên hai ông và tiễn đi.

Như thế việc sai đi truyền giáo được thể hiện như một hành vi trang trọng của Hội thánh (kinh nguyện, chay tịnh, đặt tay…) dâng hiến con người để phụng sự Chúa.

Enzo Lodi

 

 

 

 

Thứ Ba, 9 tháng 6, 2026

JUNE 10, 2026: WEDNESDAY OF THE TENTH WEEK IN ORDINARY TIME

 June 10, 2026

Wednesday of the Tenth Week in Ordinary Time

Lectionary: 361

 


Reading 1

1 Kings 18:20-39

Ahab sent to all the children of Israel
and had the prophets assemble on Mount Carmel.

Elijah appealed to all the people and said,
"How long will you straddle the issue?
If the LORD is God, follow him; if Baal, follow him."
The people, however, did not answer him.
So Elijah said to the people,
"I am the only surviving prophet of the LORD,
and there are four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal.
Give us two young bulls.
Let them choose one, cut it into pieces, and place it on the wood,
but start no fire.
I shall prepare the other and place it on the wood,
but shall start no fire.
You shall call on your gods, and I will call on the LORD.
The God who answers with fire is God."
All the people answered, "Agreed!"

Elijah then said to the prophets of Baal,
"Choose one young bull and prepare it first,
for there are more of you.
Call upon your gods, but do not start the fire."
Taking the young bull that was turned over to them, they prepared it
and called on Baal from morning to noon, saying,
"Answer us, Baal!"
But there was no sound, and no one answering.
And they hopped around the altar they had prepared.
When it was noon, Elijah taunted them:
"Call louder, for he is a god and may be meditating,
or may have retired, or may be on a journey.
Perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened."
They called out louder and slashed themselves with swords and spears,
as was their custom, until blood gushed over them.
Noon passed and they remained in a prophetic state
until the time for offering sacrifice.
But there was not a sound;
no one answered, and no one was listening.

Then Elijah said to all the people, "Come here to me."
When the people had done so, he repaired the altar of the LORD
that had been destroyed.
He took twelve stones, for the number of tribes of the sons of Jacob,
to whom the LORD had said, "Your name shall be Israel."
He built an altar in honor of the LORD with the stones,
and made a trench around the altar
large enough for two measures of grain.
When he had arranged the wood,
he cut up the young bull and laid it on the wood.
"Fill four jars with water," he said,
"and pour it over the burnt offering and over the wood."
"Do it again," he said, and they did it again.
"Do it a third time," he said,
and they did it a third time.
The water flowed around the altar,
and the trench was filled with the water.

At the time for offering sacrifice,
the prophet Elijah came forward and said,
"LORD, God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel,
let it be known this day that you are God in Israel
and that I am your servant
and have done all these things by your command.
Answer me, LORD!
Answer me, that this people may know that you, LORD, are God
and that you have brought them back to their senses."
The LORD's fire came down
and consumed the burnt offering, wood, stones, and dust,
and it lapped up the water in the trench.
Seeing this, all the people fell prostrate and said,
"The LORD is God! The LORD is God!"

 

Responsorial Psalm

Psalm 16:1b-2ab, 4, 5ab and 8, 11

R. (1b) Keep me safe, O God; you are my hope.
Keep me, O God, for in you I take refuge;
I say to the LORD, "My Lord are you."
R. Keep me safe, O God; you are my hope.
They multiply their sorrows
who court other gods.
Blood libations to them I will not pour out,
nor will I take their names upon my lips.
R. Keep me safe, O God; you are my hope.
O LORD, my allotted portion and cup,
you it is who hold fast my lot.
I set the LORD ever before me;
with him at my right hand I shall not be disturbed.
R. Keep me safe, O God; you are my hope.
You will show me the path to life,
fullness of joys in your presence,
the delights at your right hand forever.
R. Keep me safe, O God; you are my hope.
 

Alleluia

Psalm 25:4b, 5a

R. Alleluia, alleluia.
Teach me your paths, my God,
and guide me in your truth.
R. Alleluia, alleluia.
 

Gospel

Matthew 5:17-19

Jesus said to his disciples:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets.
I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.
Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away,
not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter
will pass from the law,
until all things have taken place.
Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments
and teaches others to do so
will be called least in the Kingdom of heaven.
But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments
will be called greatest in the Kingdom of heaven."

 

https://bible.usccb.org/bible/readings/061026.cfm

 

 


Commentary on 1 Kings 18:20-39

Today we have the dramatic challenge that Elijah made to the worshippers of Baal and to his own idolatrous fellow-Israelites. It will give clinching proof of who the true God is and this will finally be confirmed by the ending of the drought (tomorrow’s Ordinary Time First Reading—1 Kings 18:41-46).

The scene is on Mount Carmel, a mountain in northern Palestine near the Mediterranean coast. King Ahab, in conformity with a request from Elijah, has ordered all the Israelites to gather there together with the 450 prophets of Baal.

Elijah throws down the challenge to his people by asking them how much longer they are going to continue hopping from one leg to the other, alternating between their worship of God and of Baal and of trying to have the best of both worlds. Elijah is speaking sarcastically. In her religious ambivalence between her worship of Yahweh and of Baal, Israel is but engaging in a wild and futile religious ‘dance’.  Elijah tells them to make up their minds and choose one or the other; they cannot follow two antagonistic ways of worship. He draws a sharp contrast between the worship of the Lord and that of Baal and puts out of their minds that both deities can be worshipped in some combined rituals.

Elijah now throws down the challenge—himself against the 450 priests of Baal. He is the only true prophet in Israel to stand boldly and publicly against the king and the prophets of Baal. In fact, we are told earlier in the book that Elijah was on the run. Anyone who knew where he was hiding would be executed.

The elements of the challenge are straightforward. The 450 priests of Baal will prepare an altar with a dismembered bull and Elijah will do the same. Each side will call on the name of their divinity and the one who answers by consuming the animal with fire is the true God. To this all agree.

It is not merely a matter of deciding whether Yahweh or Baal is lord of the mountain or which is the stronger, but simply which is the one, true God.  Both the Lord and Baal were said to ride the thunderstorm as their divine chariot:

The Lord also thundered in the heavens,
and the Most High uttered his voice.
And he sent out his arrows and scattered them;
he flashed forth lightnings and routed them.
(Ps 18:13-14)

and

…you make the clouds your chariot;
you ride on the wings of the wind…
(Ps 104:3)

Elijah’s challenge is direct. His own statement, his later prayer and the people’s acclamation at the end of the reading make it clear: the uniqueness of the God of Israel is at stake.

Because of their greater numbers, Elijah told the priests of Baal to proceed first. They set up their bull on the altar and from morning to midday they called on Baal to send down fire while they danced from leg to leg (echoing the jibe against the Israelites “limping” between God and Baal). The ecstatic cultic dance was part of the pagan ritual intended to arouse the deity to perform some desired action. But nothing happened.

Elijah mocks them satirically:

Cry aloud! Surely he is a god; either he is meditating, or he has wandered away, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened.

In his mocking, Elijah also reveals he is aware of the myths surrounding Baal.

The priests shout even louder and, as is common in such religions, become wild and ecstatic, slashing themselves with knives and pouring blood. Self-inflicted wounds causing blood to flow were symbolic of self-sacrifice as an extreme method of arousing the deity to action, but such mutilation of the body was strictly forbidden in the Mosaic law. As the deadline of noon passed they continued with their ecstatic and trancelike raving in which their ritual reached its climax at the time of the evening sacrifice. But the god was silent and:

…there was no voice, no answer, and no response.

Their efforts had come to nothing; their god could do nothing to help them.

It is now Elijah’s turn. He calls on the people to gather round him. Using twelve stones to represent the 12 tribes of Israel he rebuilds the altar. It is possible it had originally been built by the people of the northern tribes after the division of the kingdom (Jerusalem and the Temple were in the southern kingdom), but had been destroyed by the agents of Jezebel and the worshippers of Baal. The 12 stones represented all the tribes of Israel as God’s one people despite the political division into two kingdoms. What is about to happen concerns the whole people and not just the 10 northern tribes. The Lord had said to the people of all the tribes: “Israel shall be your name”.

Around the altar, Elijah had an enormous trench dug large enough to hold two measures of grain. Wood was placed on top of the altar and the dismembered bull on top of that. He then gave instructions for four jars of water to be poured over the sacrificial victim and over the wood. This was done three times altogether. By drenching the whole structure with water, Elijah was making the subsequent happening all the more convincing.

Then Elijah prays. His prayer is in marked contrast to the frenzied actions of the Baal priests. He calls simply on the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, thus recalling the great covenants that had been made between God and his people. In plain language, he calls on God to answer his prayer so that people will know, not who is the more powerful, but who is the one and only God. And he appeals to Israel to remember all that the Lord has done for her since the days of her forefathers.

The coming manifestation will demonstrate:

  to the prophets of Baal and to Jezebel’s entourage of foreigners, that there is no place for them in Israel where Yahweh is God; and

  to the Israelites that Yahweh is the only God, the God who wins back wayward hearts.

In immediate response to Elijah’s prayer, the Lord’s fire comes down on the altar, consumes the holocaust offering (sodden though it is with water) and totally evaporates the water in the surrounding trench. The people’s reaction is to fall down in awe and worship, repeating over and over:

The Lord indeed is God; the Lord indeed is God.

The end of the story—not recorded in our reading—is that the priests of Baal were then seized and all of them executed by having their throats cut. Hopefully, we might think now of other less drastic ways of dealing with them.

Life with our God is, in the long run, a simple and straightforward affair. There are people who try to make religion very complicated. For many, superstition and idolatry are not far away. The idols today, from which people expect great returns, are those of the consumer society, of money, fame, power and ‘success’. The god of Mammon has taken over the lives of many, and many Christians, like the Israelites in the story, try to hop uncomfortably between the two. But Jesus said that we had to make a very clear choice—it has to be one or the other:

No one can serve two masters, for a slave will either hate the one and love the other or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth. (Matt 6:24)

The God of the gospel simply invites us to become closely united with him in prayer and love. That is the God of Elijah and should be ours too.

Comments Off

 


Commentary on Matthew 5:17-19

We have said that Matthew’s Gospel is primarily directed at a readership with a Jewish background. It is clear that their Jewish background and traditions were things which were not easy for Christian converts to give up. Both Paul and Matthew go out of their way to assure Jewish converts that Christianity is not a rejection of Judaism, but its natural development. It is everything that Judaism is and more.

So, in today’s passage, which continues the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus solemnly assures his readers:

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.

Jesus has come not to terminate the Law, but to bring it to a higher level. In a very rough simile, it is like the upgrading of a computer by upgrading its operating system. It is still the same computer doing the same things, only better. The vision of Jesus helps us to see the Law in a new light.

So Jesus says that the Law is still to be observed. Of course, we will see very clearly in the following days exactly what Jesus means. He is not saying that every single injunction of the Law (some of which seem very strange to us) has to be literally observed, but rather that the spirit behind those injunctions is still in force. His words are meant to console, but they are also a challenge, as we shall see. The New Law does not mean simply the addition of new elements. There is what we would call now a ‘paradigm shift’ to a Way which goes beyond laws to the Law of Love.

In our Church, too, we need to be ready to move forward creatively to new ways of understanding our faith and living it out. The traditions of the past are still valid, but we must never get bogged down in them to the extent that we do not respond to the clear signs of the times.  Tradition can be understood in two ways: either as a fundamental belief that has existed from the very beginning, or simply a way of doing or understanding things which has been around for a long time.

“When will the Church stop changing?” we hear some people ask. The answer is, hopefully never. The day we close ourselves to change is the day we die, as Paul warns us in the Second Letter to the Corinthians. To quote Cardinal John Newman:

To live is to change; to be perfect is to have changed often.

Cardinal Newman knew about change. He made radical changes in his own understanding of the Christian faith, changes which he saw as unavoidable although they involved great sacrifices on his part, and led him from the Anglican to the Catholic Church.

Comments Off

 

https://livingspace.sacredspace.ie/o2104g/

 

 


Wednesday, June 10, 2026

10th Week in Ordinary Time

Opening Prayer

Lord our God,

your prophets remind us in season and out of season of our responsibilities toward you and toward the world of people. When they disturb and upset us, let it be a holy disturbance that makes us restless, eager to do your will and to bring justice and love around us.

We ask you this through Christ our Lord.

Gospel Reading - Matthew 5: 17-19

'Do not imagine that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete them. In truth I tell you, till heaven and earth disappear, not one dot, not one little stroke, is to disappear from the Law until all its purpose is achieved.

Therefore, anyone who infringes even one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be considered the least in the kingdom of Heaven; but the person who keeps them and teaches them will be considered great in the kingdom of Heaven.

Reflection

Today’s Gospel (Mt 5: 17-19) teaches how to observe the law of God in such a way that its practice indicates in what its complete fulfilment consists of (Mt 5: 17-19). Matthew writes to help the communities of the converted Jews to overcome the criticism of the brothers of their own race who accused them saying: You are unfaithful to the Law of Moses”. Jesus himself had been accused of infidelity to the Law of God. Matthew has the clarifying response of Jesus concerning his accusers. Thus, he gives some light to help the communities solve their problems.

Using images of daily life, with simple and direct words, Jesus had said that the mission of the community, its reason for being, is that of being salt and light! He had given some advice regarding each one of the two images. Then follow two or three brief verses of today’s Gospel.

           Matthew 5: 17-18: Not one dot, nor one stroke is to disappear from the Law. There were several different tendencies in the communities of the first Christians. Some thought that it was not necessary to observe the laws of the Old Testament, because we are saved by faith in Jesus and not by the observance of the Law (Rm 3: 21-26). Others accepted Jesus, the Messiah, but they did not accept the liberty of spirit with which some of the communities lived the presence of Jesus. They thought that being Jews they had to continue to observe the laws of the Old Testament (Acts 15: 1, 5). But there were Christians who lived so fully in the freedom of the Spirit, who no longer looked at the life of Jesus of Nazareth, nor to the Old Testament and they even went so far as to say: ”Anathema Jesus!” (1 Co 12: 3). Observing these tensions, Matthew tries to find some balance between both extremes. The community should be a space, where the balance can be attained and lived. The answer given by Jesus to those who criticized him continued to be actual for the communities: “I have not come to abolish the law, but to complete it!” The communities could not be against the Law, nor could they close up themselves in the observance of the law. Like Jesus, they should advance, and show, in practice, which was the objective which the law wanted to attain in the life of persons, that is, in the perfect practice of love.

           Matthew 5: 19: Not one dot or stroke will disappear from the Law. It is for those who wanted to get rid of all the law that Matthew recalls the other parable of Jesus: “Anyone who infringes even one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be considered the least in the Kingdom of Heaven; but the person who keeps them and teaches them will be considered great in the Kingdom of Heaven”. The great concern in Matthew’s Gospel is to show that the Old Testament, Jesus of Nazareth and the life in the Spirit cannot be separated. The three of them form part of the same and unique project of God and communicate to us the certainty of faith: The God of Abraham and of Sarah is present in the midst of the community by faith in Jesus of Nazareth who sends us his Spirit.

Personal Questions

           How do I see and live the law of God: as a growing horizon of light or as an imposition which limits my freedom?

           What can we do today for our brothers and sisters who consider all this type of discussion as obsolete and not actual? What can we learn from them?

Concluding Prayer

Praise Yahweh, Jerusalem, Zion, praise your God.

For he gives strength to the bars of your gates, he blesses your children within you. (Ps 145: 12-13)

 

www.ocarm.org